2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2655128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worker Reciprocity and the Returns to Training: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the possibility that trained workers leave the firm before it has had time to recoup its training investment. Firms can reduce this risk by targeting training towards workers with a lower propensity for turnover, using contracts that impose penalties for premature quitting (see Hoffman and Burks, 2017), and establishing employment practices that encourage longterm relationships and worker reciprocity (see Frazis et al, 2000;Leuven, 2005;Sauermann, 2021). 8 Crucially, the investment risks created by worker turnover vary not only with worker characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the possibility that trained workers leave the firm before it has had time to recoup its training investment. Firms can reduce this risk by targeting training towards workers with a lower propensity for turnover, using contracts that impose penalties for premature quitting (see Hoffman and Burks, 2017), and establishing employment practices that encourage longterm relationships and worker reciprocity (see Frazis et al, 2000;Leuven, 2005;Sauermann, 2021). 8 Crucially, the investment risks created by worker turnover vary not only with worker characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%