2009
DOI: 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2009.tb00059.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worked Shell from Leta Leta Cave, Palawan, Philippines

Abstract: The Leta Leta Cave burial site is a distinctive and enigmatic site of the Philippine Neolithic, excavated by Robert Fox. Containing a number of burials, its unusual earthenware pottery -including the 'yawning-mouth vessel', small footed goblets and a cut-out pedestalled bowl -have seen it recognised in the Philippines as an official site of national significance. In addition to the human remains and earthenware, Fox recovered a sizeable assemblage of shell artefacts which, as with other material remains recove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shells manifesting such traces may have been deliberately brought to a site by humans for use as a raw material in artefact production (e.g. Szabó, 2008Szabó, , 2009b, but by virtue of their taphonomic signatures cannot represent food waste. To this list can be added markers indicating that the shell was inhabited by a coenobitid hermit crab rather than a mollusc.…”
Section: The Importance Of Isolating Hermitted Shell Within Archaeolomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shells manifesting such traces may have been deliberately brought to a site by humans for use as a raw material in artefact production (e.g. Szabó, 2008Szabó, , 2009b, but by virtue of their taphonomic signatures cannot represent food waste. To this list can be added markers indicating that the shell was inhabited by a coenobitid hermit crab rather than a mollusc.…”
Section: The Importance Of Isolating Hermitted Shell Within Archaeolomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitutes in clay and stone were made in Luzon, but the technology clearly continued to spread in coastal areas: thus we find Tridacna shell adzes of Neolithic type reappearing in Bukit Tengkorak and East Timor (Glover 1986: 117;Bellwood & Koon 1989: 618) and then in Lapita. Distinctive shell ornaments such as Conus rings have been found on Palawan at Leta Leta (Szabo & Ramirez 2009), at Krai near Surakarta on Java (van Heekeren 1972: 164, pl. 88), at Uattamdi on Kayoa near Halmahera and in the earliest Marianas and Lapita sites (Hung 2008: 222).…”
Section: The Austronesian and Neolithic 'Package'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the first seafaring groups arrived, spreading Neolithic culture in Island Southeast Asia and Oceania (Bellwood, 1997(Bellwood, , 2002(Bellwood, , 2004Cameron, 2002;Garong & Toizumi, 2000;Green, 2003;Solheim, 2006;Spriggs, 2003;Tanudirjo, 2004). Archaeological evidence of this Neolithic dispersal is abundant in the Philippines (e.g., Anderson, 2005;Bellwood & Dizon, 2005;Hung, 2005;Mijares, 2005) and includes shell middens (Aoyagi et al, 1993;Cabanilla, 1972;Faylona, 2003;Garong, 2001;Garong & Toizumi, 2000;Ogawa, 2000;Tanaka, 1997;Thiel, 1989) that have provided important insights into culture and subsistence (Fox, 1970;Kress, 1978;Szabó & Ramirez, 2009). However, in the Philippines, paleoenvironmental studies conducted on shells, especially from archaeological contexts, have been limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%