1977
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.23.9.963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Stretch Properties for the Scheduling of Continuous Operations Under Alternative Labor Policies

Abstract: For a seven-day's-a-week operation in which N employees are needed on each weekday and n on each weekend day, with N at least as large as n, the work stretch is developed for each of several different rest policies. The work stretch is the number of consecutive work days between rest days. Additionally, work force size formulas are developed for policies not previously covered in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burns and Carter [5] use an iterative approach to deal with a situation where the employee requirement varies for each day of the week, each employee gets exactly 2 days off in a week, receives at least A out of every B weekends off, and has a maximum work stretch of 6 days. Their research generalizes the works of Brownell and Lowerre [3], Lowerre [10], Baker and Magazine [1], Burns [4], and Baker, Burns, and Carter [2]. Iterative scheduling algorithms differ from cyclic scheduling algorithms in that the long-run schedules experienced by individual workers need not be identical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Burns and Carter [5] use an iterative approach to deal with a situation where the employee requirement varies for each day of the week, each employee gets exactly 2 days off in a week, receives at least A out of every B weekends off, and has a maximum work stretch of 6 days. Their research generalizes the works of Brownell and Lowerre [3], Lowerre [10], Baker and Magazine [1], Burns [4], and Baker, Burns, and Carter [2]. Iterative scheduling algorithms differ from cyclic scheduling algorithms in that the long-run schedules experienced by individual workers need not be identical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Individualized rosters, on the other hand, can cater to the preferences of individual employees and adapt to fluctuations in demand levels more readily, but are more tedious to generate. Examples of work on cyclic scheduling are found in (Baker and Magazine, 1977;Burns and Koop, 1987;Emmons, 1985;Emmons and Burns, 1991 ;Koop, 1988;Lowerre, 1977;Panton, 1991). Individualized scheduling is Core stages in the general rostering model.…”
Section: Manpower Rostering Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal solutions to some single shift problems with single or many categories of employees and multiple shift problems with a single category of employees have been found. Burns and Carter (1985) deal with a problem having a single shift and a single category of employees generalizing the research done earlier by Brownell and Lowerre (1976), Lowerre (1977), Baker and Magazine (1977), Burns (1978) and Baker, Burns and Carter (1979), Burns and Koop (1987) provide a modular approach for finding optimal solution to workforce scheduling problems characterized by multiple shifts and a single category of employees. Burns (1981) describes an iterative algorithm for the same problem, Emmons and Burns (1991) discuss a cyclic algorithm for single shift scheduling problem with many categories of employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%