1996
DOI: 10.2307/1171236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work, Status, and Income: Men in the American Occupational Structure since the Late Nineteenth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of occupation has a long tradition in Sociology and Economics, and occupation serves as a core concept in research on wage determination, human capital acquisition, careers, social stratification and social mobility, and other fields such as social and friendship networks or cultural consumption (Blau & Duncan, 1967;Chan & Goldthorpe, 2007;De Beyer & Knight, 1989;Kambourov & Manovskii, 2008;Perales, 2013; entities which emerge, evolve, disappear and reappear with changes in the structure of work (Abbott, 1989;Sobek, 1996). As a consequence, classifications often become obsolete and are superseded by new versions or completely new instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of occupation has a long tradition in Sociology and Economics, and occupation serves as a core concept in research on wage determination, human capital acquisition, careers, social stratification and social mobility, and other fields such as social and friendship networks or cultural consumption (Blau & Duncan, 1967;Chan & Goldthorpe, 2007;De Beyer & Knight, 1989;Kambourov & Manovskii, 2008;Perales, 2013; entities which emerge, evolve, disappear and reappear with changes in the structure of work (Abbott, 1989;Sobek, 1996). As a consequence, classifications often become obsolete and are superseded by new versions or completely new instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the results for 1900 (the pre-migration period) and Table 2 for 1910 (the post-migration period). In Table 1, the 1950-based income scores from IPUMS and the 1890-based income scores from Sobek (1996) were higher for migrants compared with non-migrants. The differences are significant at the 0.05-level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of the significant compression in American wages in the 1940s (Goldin and Margo 1992), 1950-based income scores for 1900 and 1910 likely understate the true differences in occupational incomes. 6 I relied instead on the 1890 income estimates available by occupation from Matthew Sobek's (1996) comprehensive study on incomes by occupation in 1890. 7 Further, I used Samuel Preston and Michael Haines's (1991) (2000), I increased farm incomes by 18.5%, corresponding to the urban/rural cost-of-living difference found in 1892 Michigan by Timothy Hatton and Jeffrey Williamson (1991).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Sobek (1996), "our understanding of historical social structure and where people fit in is bound up with the interpretation of occupations." 13 Thernstrom (1973) argued that the measurement of occupational mobility "requires a specification of the broad occupational categories that may be considered socially distinct, and a definition of which jobs fit in which category."…”
Section: Geographic Clustering and Occupational Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%