2019
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation in Cancer

Abstract: Conclusion: This study did not reveal any significant clinically relevant advantage of work-related medical rehabilitation at one year. Future studies should determine whether a second period of rehabilitation might be helpful and whether selected subjects might benefit from the assistance of case managers beyond the period of rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies, of which three RCTs, studied the effect of an intervention on perceived health and work participation [ 17 19 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 33 ]. The interventions of Pedersen et al [ 18 ], Fauser et al [ 17 ] and Van Eijk-Hustings et al [ 19 ] did not have a significant effect on perceived health. The intervention in the cohort study of Chu et al [ 28 ] on thought management and activity planning among employees with chronic non-cancer pain increased perceived health and improved the work status of employees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Seven studies, of which three RCTs, studied the effect of an intervention on perceived health and work participation [ 17 19 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 33 ]. The interventions of Pedersen et al [ 18 ], Fauser et al [ 17 ] and Van Eijk-Hustings et al [ 19 ] did not have a significant effect on perceived health. The intervention in the cohort study of Chu et al [ 28 ] on thought management and activity planning among employees with chronic non-cancer pain increased perceived health and improved the work status of employees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies described interventions on coping strategies and work participation, of which five RCTs and two cohort studies [ 13 , 15 , 17 , 23 , 27 , 33 , 40 ]. The “Stimulating health participation and relapse prevention at work” intervention of Arends et al [ 27 ] among employees with common mental disorders and the “Cognitive behavioral group intervention on work-anxiety” of Muschalla et al [ 15 ] among employees with orthopedic, cardiologic and neurological disorders changed coping and improved work participation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, more patients aged above 60 years who have various comorbidities—as well as side effects and implications for rehabilitation measures—are being transplanted [ 12 , 13 ]. The role of rehabilitation in this age group is no longer to enable the patient to return to work [ 14 , 15 ]; another caveat is that older people are more likely to have lost their partner, to be living alone, and to be not as socially integrated as patients that are working [ 13 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Allohctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wir können die hier vorgelegten repräsentativen Daten nutzen, um klinische Studiendaten hinsichtlich der Verallgemeinerung ihrer Ergebnisse abzuschätzen und Quoten zur Rückkehr in Arbeit einordnen zu können. Beispielhaft soll dies anhand einer bereits erwähnten Studie gezeigt werden[17]. Die randomisierte Studie untersuchte in vier onkologischen Rehabilitationseinrichtungen die Wirksamkeit einer medizinisch-beruflich orientierten Rehabilitation im Vergleich zur medizinischen Rehabilitation bei onkologischen Erkrankungen (n = 484)[17].…”
unclassified