Abstract:The present research examines the integration into employment of prisoners on parole who had been under the supervision of the Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority during the period 2007-2010. The supervision program included rehabilitation in the community, with the emphasis on employment. The research compares integration in employment and rates of reincarceration for the supervised group with prisoners who had been released from prison after serving their full sentences. The findings indicate that among prison… Show more
“…Through analysis of each ex-offender’s personal account paired with an in-depth literature review, the desperate need for improvements and change regarding transitional programs and support was clear (Brown, 2004; Smith-Merry et al, 2019; Soeker et al, 2013). However, only a few transitional programs such as support for transitional housing, and job placement / vocational training exist that aim to fill such gaps (Bowman & Ely, 2020; Fox, 2012; Peled-Laskov et al, 2019). Jaegers et al (2020) implemented a jail-based transitional program, and the findings were congruent with our participants’ personal accounts which point to the need for improved access to and resources within transitional programs for ex-offenders.…”
This qualitative study explored ex-offender’s community reintegration experiences following a prison sentence. Fourteen ex-offenders from the Offender Alumni Association participated in an in-person in-depth individual interview regarding their current roles, daily routines, living situation, activity participation, and current and future plans. A phenomenological approach using thematic analysis was employed for data collection and interpretation. The emerged themes were categorized under facilitators and barriers that influence healthy community reintegration. The facilitators included visualizing and committing to an ideal future, establishing a daily routine, upholding life balance, and discovering and connecting to external supports. The barriers included impediments to employment opportunities, lack of financial resources, social stigma, regulations imposed by the judicial system, disconnection from social advancements, and addiction to drugs and alcohol. The themes identified from the interviews suggest that current reintegration strategies and programs need to be improved in order to benefit ex-offenders seeking these services.
“…Through analysis of each ex-offender’s personal account paired with an in-depth literature review, the desperate need for improvements and change regarding transitional programs and support was clear (Brown, 2004; Smith-Merry et al, 2019; Soeker et al, 2013). However, only a few transitional programs such as support for transitional housing, and job placement / vocational training exist that aim to fill such gaps (Bowman & Ely, 2020; Fox, 2012; Peled-Laskov et al, 2019). Jaegers et al (2020) implemented a jail-based transitional program, and the findings were congruent with our participants’ personal accounts which point to the need for improved access to and resources within transitional programs for ex-offenders.…”
This qualitative study explored ex-offender’s community reintegration experiences following a prison sentence. Fourteen ex-offenders from the Offender Alumni Association participated in an in-person in-depth individual interview regarding their current roles, daily routines, living situation, activity participation, and current and future plans. A phenomenological approach using thematic analysis was employed for data collection and interpretation. The emerged themes were categorized under facilitators and barriers that influence healthy community reintegration. The facilitators included visualizing and committing to an ideal future, establishing a daily routine, upholding life balance, and discovering and connecting to external supports. The barriers included impediments to employment opportunities, lack of financial resources, social stigma, regulations imposed by the judicial system, disconnection from social advancements, and addiction to drugs and alcohol. The themes identified from the interviews suggest that current reintegration strategies and programs need to be improved in order to benefit ex-offenders seeking these services.
“…Participation in the psychological treatment program twice a week, once individually and once as part of a group where each session lasts 50 minutes. The prisoner's consent to participate in the program, following its approval, must be obtained prior to his release from prison (Peled-Laskov, Shoham, & Cojocaru, 2019).…”
Section: The Israeli Employment Supervision Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research has been conducted to examine the effectiveness of such programs based on indices showing proclivity towards criminal activity (Peled-Laskov & Bialer, 2013;Peled-Laskov, Shoham, & Cojocaru, 2019), to our knowledge no research has focused on the manner in which the programs are perceived by their operators. The present study seeks to explore the challenges and obstacles facing the released prisoners participating in the program, as well as the contribution of the supervision employment program to successful integration of paroled prisoners in a normative cycle of life.…”
Section: The Israeli Employment Supervision Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems that the prisoner must face on his reentry into the community come to the surface in the course of both individual and group psychological treatment. The principal issues concern problems at work, difficulty in bowing to authority, coping with the temptation to return to crime and the lure of making a quick windfall, domestic problems and stresses, marital problems, low self-image, and traumas from the period of imprisonment (Peled-Laskov, Shoham, & Cojocaru, 2019).…”
Section: Can Lawbreakers Really Be Rehabilitated?mentioning
The integration of paroled prisoners in employment is presented in the theoretical and research-based literature as one of the principal means of achieving successful re-entry by the prisoners into the community. The literature deals extensively with the correlation between integration and perseverance in employment and risk indices, the most pronounced of which is a return to crime. According to the Theory of Desistance from Crime, it is not enough for criminal activity to cease; a complex process must set in motion to bring about a change in perceptions and behaviour in all walks of life, especially regarding employment. A key program being implemented by Israel's Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority is one involving an employment guidance and supervision program for paroled prisoners. The program emphasizes employment in all its facets -placement, support during the period of employment and supervision during parole -alongside psychological treatment and rehabilitation in the community. Operating the program are employment supervisors and psychotherapists. In order to understand how the program is managed and perceived by its operators, in-depth interviews were conducted with seven psychotherapists and employment counsellors in the framework of the present qualitative-interpretive research. The article describes the perceptions of the personnel responsible for running the program during the period 2018-2020. The findings of the research highlight the difficulties and limitations the prisoners face, harmony and dissonance in the encounter between supervisors and psychotherapists, the dilemma over protection of society vs. assistance to the prisoners, employment characteristics as indicative of the rehabilitation process, and the merits of the program. The article also discusses the contribution of employment supervision to successful reintegration of paroled prisoners in normative employment and society.
“…In assessing the performance of correctional services, a key indicator for prison administrators, management, and researchers is parolee rates of recidivism, typically referring to a return to crime or prison (1). The literature on desistance from crime and the post-release trajectory of prisoners has blossomed in many countries (2–8). However, desistance remains marked by ongoing debates, primarily around definitional matters (e.g., the meaning of “desistance”) but also theoretical questions related to how and why desistance occurs (9).…”
As a key indicator of correctional performance, returns to custody are a topic of much empirical inquiry, yet there remains considerable debate regarding questions around who returns and why, as well as the factors that support or impede successful post-release outcomes. Research examining the post-release trajectories of federal releasees in the Canadian context, particularly in the case of women, is necessary to identify opportunities for more responsive case management practices. Drawing on the case files of 43 formerly-federally-incarcerated women referred to a day reporting centre in a large Canadian city, we explore the profiles of women who returned to federal custody from those who did not, considering factors related to demographics, personal history, specifically mental health and mental health needs, static risk and dynamic need. In general, we found that those who returned to custody tended to have more needs and more complex needs relative to non-returners. Notable differences were evident in relation to criminal history, reintegration potential, dynamic factor needs, the presence of a mental health condition, the presence of substance addiction and institutional adjustment (as measured by institutional charges and segregation placements). While not attempting to present causal relationships, we shed light on the case management needs of this particular group and identify areas in need of further inquiry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.