2016
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1162854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work-related difficulties in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review on predictors and associated factors

Abstract: Evidence on the effect of rehabilitation interventions on TBI patients' work-related difficulties exists, but is poorly measured. Future studies should address the sustainability of holistic and tailored interventions targeting employees, employers and workplaces and aimed to reduce the gap between work duties and worker's abilities, using appropriate assessment instruments measuring difficulties in work activities. Implications for rehabilitation Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) primarily affects young persons of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We encourage researchers to take advantage of research and literature reviews on the experiences of persons with disabilities from other domains, beyond the scope of treatment in work organizations, to guide future research on treatment in the workplace. For example, insights can be found regarding severity (e.g., Prince, ; Slatore, Harber, & Haggerty, ), chronicity (e.g., Crook, Milner, Schultz, & Stringer, ; Pincus, Burton, Vogel, & Field, ), and use of longitudinal data (e.g., Jahoda, Kemp, Riddell, & Banks, ; Scaratti et al, ). We also encourage researchers to explicitly acknowledge these complexities head‐on by clearly stating definitions and operationalization, and to note limits of the generalizability of their findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We encourage researchers to take advantage of research and literature reviews on the experiences of persons with disabilities from other domains, beyond the scope of treatment in work organizations, to guide future research on treatment in the workplace. For example, insights can be found regarding severity (e.g., Prince, ; Slatore, Harber, & Haggerty, ), chronicity (e.g., Crook, Milner, Schultz, & Stringer, ; Pincus, Burton, Vogel, & Field, ), and use of longitudinal data (e.g., Jahoda, Kemp, Riddell, & Banks, ; Scaratti et al, ). We also encourage researchers to explicitly acknowledge these complexities head‐on by clearly stating definitions and operationalization, and to note limits of the generalizability of their findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly notable that the vast majority of research on work retention after ABI almost solely relies on individual and medical factors,13–22 while we have access to very little sound evidence regarding the specific workplace factors involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies investigating work retention after ABI include only individual factors 13–22. Well-established individual factors related to increased work retention are lower injury severity, higher education and male gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding work reintegration, the literature includes studies that lead to the identification of factors that facilitate or hinder return to work and reintegration into the social environment, such as the severity of trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale; GCS), duration of hospitalization, sex, employment prior to the traumatic event, level of education, and the timeliness and intensity of the intervention (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). IMoVR aims to create timely and intensive intervention, from the hospital to the reintegration phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%