2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2020.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work modes recognition and boundary identification of MFR pulse sequences with a hierarchical seq2seq LSTM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, neural networks have been extensively adopted to learn the PRI pattern from intercepted pulse train. Patterns stored in the neural network have achieved excellent performance in deinterleaving [16] and identifying [17]. However, the neural network methods require considerable time and workforce to label the data, and the obtained PRI pattern is not interpretable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, neural networks have been extensively adopted to learn the PRI pattern from intercepted pulse train. Patterns stored in the neural network have achieved excellent performance in deinterleaving [16] and identifying [17]. However, the neural network methods require considerable time and workforce to label the data, and the obtained PRI pattern is not interpretable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFRs can be effectively modeled as discrete event systems (DES), Visnevski first proposed a hierarchical model for g describing the behaviors of MFRs, in which the MFR signals are represented by radar pulses, radar words, and radar phrases. With the hierarchical model, several syntax-based methods [2], [5], as well as the statistical-based methods [6][7][8][9][10], have been proposed to analyze the MFR behavior state. However, most of those methods have only been proven effective for some simple radars like the Mercury [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of those methods have only been proven effective for some simple radars like the Mercury [6]. Later on, researchers focus on neural networks for MFR recognition and introduce several models such as Long Short-Term Memory networks(LSTM) [7]- [9], gated recurrent unit(GRU) [10], discrete process neural network [11]. With enough training samples, neural network-based methods outperform traditional statistical-based methods under more complex tasks [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early techniques used in the traditional interceptors like the template matching [15,16] or the statistical histogram methods [17] are incapable of dealing with the dynamically varying behaviours in the CR. Later studies investigated the automatic modulation recognition (AMR) of both inter-and intra-pulse modulations (or modulation on pulse; MOP) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] through recognising the modulation patterns of different parameters in a pulse sequence. These methods were designed initially to recognise the modulation type of a single control parameter only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%