1986
DOI: 10.1177/072551368601400107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work, Leisure and Human Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical shot and Bose noise contribute in roughly equal amounts to the total photon noise at each observing frequency, with the BLIP NEP γ ≃ 1.5 mK/ √ Hz (2.3 mK CM B / √ Hz) at 143 GHz and the BLIP NEP γ ≃ 0.8 mK/ √ Hz (4.5 mK CM B / √ Hz) at 268 GHz. 2 More details of the Bolocam instrument can be found in Glenn et al (1998), Glenn et al (2003), Haig et al (2004), and Sayers (2007).…”
Section: Instrument Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical shot and Bose noise contribute in roughly equal amounts to the total photon noise at each observing frequency, with the BLIP NEP γ ≃ 1.5 mK/ √ Hz (2.3 mK CM B / √ Hz) at 143 GHz and the BLIP NEP γ ≃ 0.8 mK/ √ Hz (4.5 mK CM B / √ Hz) at 268 GHz. 2 More details of the Bolocam instrument can be found in Glenn et al (1998), Glenn et al (2003), Haig et al (2004), and Sayers (2007).…”
Section: Instrument Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then (5) becomes equivalent to (12) [ 1 : 2( * ), 1( * ) ], and this, in conjunction with Theorem 3 in Sayers [12], then gives us…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Of the remaining 247 cases, exactly 81 are further eliminated by conditions (7) The remaining sixteen cases (of the 136 mentioned above) are eliminated once we prove three further lemmata, namely Lemmata (7) through (35) will also eliminate every possible case for the exponents in (1) if we assume any one of Ω(N ) = 29, 31, or 33. Therefore, recalling that it is known that Ω(N ) ≥ 29 (Sayers [12]), it suffices, for the proof of Theorem 1, to prove the lemmata stated in (14) through (35); we outline these proofs in the following section.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the first high-pass filter, we remove a 2dimensional spatial polynomial function across the array (Sayers 2007;Halverson et al 2009) at each sample in the timestream. During this process, referred to as spatial template removal, we fit the polynomial either across the entire array, or individually for each of the six detector wafers to improve removal of correlated signals on scales smaller than the 0.4 • field-of-view.…”
Section: Removal Of Timestream Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%