2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work In Process Control for a High Product Mix Manufacturing System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providing multiple products requires flexible workstations with minimum waiting time and defective items. Kanban is seen to fulfil these objectives quite effectively as it does not allow production until there is customer demand (Olaitan, Yu, & Alfnes, 2017). Moreover, scheduling intermittent production by incorporating the Kanban system significantly reduces inventories and thus improves productivity (Bernegger & Webster, 2014).…”
Section: Kanbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing multiple products requires flexible workstations with minimum waiting time and defective items. Kanban is seen to fulfil these objectives quite effectively as it does not allow production until there is customer demand (Olaitan, Yu, & Alfnes, 2017). Moreover, scheduling intermittent production by incorporating the Kanban system significantly reduces inventories and thus improves productivity (Bernegger & Webster, 2014).…”
Section: Kanbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper handling of components and semi-finished products forming the so-called Work in Process (WIP) is suggested in [5] for reducing the lead time and improving the delivery performance of HMLV production. This work, implicitly, also emphasizes the importance of the right sizing of internal buffers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Settings of the simulation model were determined by different lot-sizing (grouping and splitting) and sequencing rules. These rules were suggested by planners of the factory and by the literature [5,13,26,27]. The following options were investigated:…”
Section: Analyzing the Impact Of Dynamic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturing throughput time is significantly higher than the value adding time, and it is highly variable, which makes planning difficult for the downstream assembly of the components produced. In a previous phase of the project, in which CONWIP control mechanism was applied to regulate system inventory and a sequencing rule to control production at the workstations, significant improvements were achieved in the throughput time's mean and its variation [1,2]. However, as it is the case with tighter control of inventory in manufacturing, previously unrealised problems were exposed in relation to the selection of the product model to release into the CONWIP loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the problem highlighted above, a CONWIP control was implemented in the sewing section to limit the volume of work in progress (WIP) in the section, with an intermediate buffer also created between the two sections. The lower amount of WIP, judging by Little's law [3], reduced the throughput time [1,2]. The intermediate buffer served decoupling purposes between the flow of items out of the cutting section and their release into the sewing section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%