“…The distribution of the density of contributions has two modes and is strongly asymmetric (figure 14.1). A similar pattern has been reported in Argentina (Bertranou and Sánchez 2003;Farall et al 2003), Chile (Berstein, Larraín, and Pino 2006;Bravo et al 2006), and Uruguay (Lagomarsino and Lanzilotta 2004;Forteza et al 2009;Bucheli, Forteza, and Rossi 2010). In the sample, 26 percent of the workers have a full contribution density, which was the most frequent density of contributions in the database.…”