2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work hardening model based on multiple dislocation densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike DDD which becomes handicapped at high strains, such a strategy would be well suited for large-strain problems with high quantities of dislocations, since any amount of dislocations can still be represented a dislocation density. The earlier group of dislocation-density models deals with discrete categories of dislocation density, such as mobile vs. immobile, cell-interior vs. cell-wall, and edge vs. screw (Roters et al, 2000;Prasad et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2006;Alankar et al, 2011;Vinogradov et al, 2012), but without considering the field nature of the dislocation densities and the conservative nature of their motion (Walgraef and Aifantis, 1985). A more sophisticated group of approach focuses primarily on the kinematics or dynamics of slip systems (Asaro and Rice, 1977) and their relationships to densities of dislocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike DDD which becomes handicapped at high strains, such a strategy would be well suited for large-strain problems with high quantities of dislocations, since any amount of dislocations can still be represented a dislocation density. The earlier group of dislocation-density models deals with discrete categories of dislocation density, such as mobile vs. immobile, cell-interior vs. cell-wall, and edge vs. screw (Roters et al, 2000;Prasad et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2006;Alankar et al, 2011;Vinogradov et al, 2012), but without considering the field nature of the dislocation densities and the conservative nature of their motion (Walgraef and Aifantis, 1985). A more sophisticated group of approach focuses primarily on the kinematics or dynamics of slip systems (Asaro and Rice, 1977) and their relationships to densities of dislocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Describing the WH behavior in the above manner using a single dislocation density is also known as 'single parameter' approach and the concept has been found effective in describing the WH behavior of face-centered-cubic single crystal. However, instead of assuming a single dislocation density everywhere, considering various dislocation densities of different types of dislocations are reported to be helpful in modeling the WH phenomena in a polycrystalline alloy [3][4][5]. However, a 'single parameter' approach, which is based on a uniform dislocation density, is often good enough and simple to explain overall WH phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies [25,26] showed that when the dynamic recrystallization softening of the material occurs, the curve between the work hardening rate (h) and true stress (r) will exhibit inflection point, and the dynamic recrystallization critical strain (e c ) corresponds to the maximum value in dh/dr-r curve and the inflection point in h-r curve. Taking the true stress-strain curve of Nb-free steel obtained at a strain rate of 0.1 s -1 and 1200°C (see Fig.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Critical Strain Of Dynamic Recrystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%