1973
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4608/3/9/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function measurements on (100), (110) and (111) surfaces of aluminium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
67
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the midst of simple metals, the face-dependent experimental data of work function only for low-index aluminium crystal-faces are available but they differ between each other in the trend of increasing of their values (see Table III). The trend of Eastman and Mee's [21] values is consistent with the argumentation given by Smoluchowski [22], while the trend of Grepstad et al [23] values is in complete disagreement with these arguments.…”
Section: Polycrystalline and Face-dependent Work Functionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…From the midst of simple metals, the face-dependent experimental data of work function only for low-index aluminium crystal-faces are available but they differ between each other in the trend of increasing of their values (see Table III). The trend of Eastman and Mee's [21] values is consistent with the argumentation given by Smoluchowski [22], while the trend of Grepstad et al [23] values is in complete disagreement with these arguments.…”
Section: Polycrystalline and Face-dependent Work Functionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…22 Besides, for the readers' reference, we list the available calculated and experimental work function data of all these pure metals in Table S1 as Supplementary Materials. For comparison, calculated 29 and measured 33,34 work functions for pure Al(111), (110) and (100) faces in the literature are also given in the table inserted in Fig. 5, Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work function of different crystal faces of pure metals (Mg, Zn, Al, Cu, Si) calculated in our work. Corresponding literature data for pure Al (calculated 29 and measured 33,34 ) are listed in the inserted table. showing a good agreement with our calculation. In our calculations, we used GGA-PW91 exchange-correlation functional, which gives a better agreement with the experimental data compared to GGA-PBE exchange-correlation functional used in that calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could calculate directly the electronic workfunction difference with the pure metal, measuring the difference between the vacuum level near the surface of the oxide film and the vacuum level near the surface of the metal. For the Al(111) surface, a calculated value of 4.1 eV was obtained, to be compared with the experimental value of 4.25 eV [40]. The first full metal layer under this Al interface layer is referred here with the index l = 1, then l = 2 represents the next underneath metal layer and l = 3 the third metal layer.…”
Section: Electronic and Charge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our periodic cells exhibit two different surfaces, the pure metal surface at the bottom and the oxide film at the top. Thus, we could calculate directly the electronic workfunction difference with the pure metal, measuring the difference between the vacuum level near the surface of the oxide film and the vacuum level near the surface of the [40].…”
Section: Electronic and Charge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%