2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9326-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Engagement of Dual-Working Couples: Dissimilarity and Its Relation to Both Partners’ Well-Being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary evidence supports the possibility of work engagement as a higher-level phenomenon (Costa et al, 2014;Hakanen et al, 2006;Torrente et al, 2013). Studies show that work engagement is observable by others (Tonković Grabovac et al, 2016) and that highly engaged employees are more communicative, charismatic, and creative (Bakker & Xanthopoulou, 2013). Based on this, we suggest that work engagement can be analyzed at the unit-level.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Preliminary evidence supports the possibility of work engagement as a higher-level phenomenon (Costa et al, 2014;Hakanen et al, 2006;Torrente et al, 2013). Studies show that work engagement is observable by others (Tonković Grabovac et al, 2016) and that highly engaged employees are more communicative, charismatic, and creative (Bakker & Xanthopoulou, 2013). Based on this, we suggest that work engagement can be analyzed at the unit-level.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The spillover effect is an interdomain, intraindividual occurrence in one's experiences in one life domain that influences experiences in another life domain (Westman, 2001). Previous research showed strong evidence for the crossover and spillover of work engagement (e.g., Bakker et al, 2005;Grabovac et al, 2015;Li et al, 2022;Westman et al, 2009).…”
Section: Spillover Of Parental Moods To Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for the idea that joint team boosting behaviors relate positively to team work engagement can be found in theories of affective contagion and resource exchange. First, regarding affective contagion, team boosting behaviors are teamfocused and encompass high energy and positivity, making them highly visible (Grabovac et al, 2016). Such salient emotions and behaviors likely serve as cues for other members and shape shared experiences (Bakker et al, 2006;Elfenbein, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%