2002
DOI: 10.1177/154193120204600310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Centered Support System Design: Using Frames to Reduce Work Complexity

Abstract: We have been developing user interface clients as fully integrated support systems. A Work Centered Support System aids work by using direct and indirect, passive and active methods. An important property of WCSS systems is the use of form representations as passive devices to help reduce work complexity while simultaneously aid users in adaptive problem solving. Based on our experience implementing the design of three WCSSs we have distilled a set of three form-based design principles that help insure a work-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These projects' outcomes have been sufficiently successful to motivate description and promotion of their origins in terms of both a new type of IS product (work-centered support systems) and a novel form of IS design practice (work-centered design) (e.g., Eggleston, 2003;Eggleston & Whitaker, 2002;Eggleston, Young & Whitaker, 2000;Scott et al, 2005). Grateful as I am for these developments, I cannot claim they reflect more than isolated tidbits about my actual design praxis and tactics in the course of the referenced projects.…”
Section: Figure 1: Overview Of the Is Design Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These projects' outcomes have been sufficiently successful to motivate description and promotion of their origins in terms of both a new type of IS product (work-centered support systems) and a novel form of IS design practice (work-centered design) (e.g., Eggleston, 2003;Eggleston & Whitaker, 2002;Eggleston, Young & Whitaker, 2000;Scott et al, 2005). Grateful as I am for these developments, I cannot claim they reflect more than isolated tidbits about my actual design praxis and tactics in the course of the referenced projects.…”
Section: Figure 1: Overview Of the Is Design Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peripheral tools comprise a frame for the vantage display. Because this design strategy progresses from problem to vantage to frame, it has been labeled the Problem-Vantage-Frame approach (Eggleston & Whitaker, 2002).…”
Section: User 'Phenomenology' As the Object Of Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of this collaboration will depend upon shared semantics and upon a shared model of the work to be done. This vocabulary should be that of the system's users, as espoused by the First-Person principle of WCSS (Eggleston & Whitaker, 2002). To be adaptive, a user-interface must be driven by evolving models of the work domain and of the human user of the system.…”
Section: Adaptive Work-centered Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5 An Introduction to the APVF Ontology Eggleston and Whitaker (2002) propose the Problem-Vantage-Frame principle as a general guide in designing work-centered support systems, as follows:…”
Section: User Interface Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation