Words and worlds: textual representation and new materialism

Abstract

In recent years, academic disciplines across the social sciences and humanities have witnessed a surge of interest around questions of materiality. One strand of this work has been ambitious in its attempts to theorise ‘things-in-themselves’, or the nature and potential of matter, constituting what has come to be called a ‘new materialism’. Geographers have been particularly influential in these debates, especially through research conducted in the style of non-representational theory. In this work, much emphasis is placed on bodies, objects and enactment in specific spaces and places. Although representation has been theorised within this literature as eventful and performative, there remains relatively little research into the textual and narrative practices by which words make worlds. My interest in this article, therefore, is to draw out how language has been theorised within non-representational theory and in new materialist thought more broadly, with the aim of developing a more nuanced understanding of the work that textual representations do in constituting the material realm. Specifically, I explore how text may be seen as eventful, performative and generative. The second half of the article opens these ideas further through an analysis of The Hare with Amber Eyes, a memoir that in its explicit concern with physical things demonstrates how particular vocabularies, narratives and indeed silences can work to generate the world of the tangible. Moreover, the book explores the nature and possibilities of stories as things themselves, in ways that may open fresh questions for new materialist theory.

Feminism and futurity: Geographies of resistance, resilience and reworking

“…Linked to this recognition is the necessity of providing other ways of knowing and narrating the economy as a means of transforming the relations we hold with ourselves, the world and the future (Gibson-Graham et al, 2013). We see in new materialist approaches an effort to go further in interrogating the limits of language and representation by exploring ‘things-in-themselves’ as materialities and forces (Daya, 2019: 361). Cultivating new feminist geographical knowledges by taking up the work of Irigaray (often in relation to Deleuze), scholars investigate the nature and potential of bodies and matter beyond their ideological articulations and discursive inscriptions (e.g.…”

Toxic sights: The spectacle of hazardous waste removal

“…In epistemological terms, there is of course no representation that is immaterial and no material without representation (Rose and Tolia-Kelly, 2012). I move past the conceptual concern ‘of whether the discursive and the material are separate realms’ (Daya, 2019: 372), and instead examine what representations do , how are they made and how they make a difference (Anderson, 2019). In doing this, I examine removal as a knowledge-producing assemblage; Michelle Murphy (2006: 3) articulates this as a ‘technical and social constellation of words, things, practices, and people’.…”

Cultural geography III: The concept of ‘culture’

“…Partly in response to these discussions and disagreements, recent work on culture as mediated experience expands what Grossberg (2010) calls the channels and forms of mediation beyond the linguistic-discursive, without ignoring the force and feel of representations as they become with lived experience (witness, for example, Harris and Nowicki (2018) on ‘imaginaries’, Daya (2019) on how ‘words make worlds’, and Mendas and Lau (2019) on the affectivity of ‘narrations’). First, a series of affective conditions – structures of feeling or moods or atmospheres – are taken to mediate lived experience (Bille and Simonsen, 2019; Raynor, 2016).…”