Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w17-4703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Representations in Factored Neural Machine Translation

Abstract: Translation into a morphologically rich language requires a large output vocabulary to model various morphological phenomena, which is a challenge for neural machine translation architectures. To address this issue, the present paper investigates the impact of having two output factors with a system able to generate separately two distinct representations of the target words. Within this framework, we investigate several word representations that correspond to different distributions of morpho-syntactic inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the above works, there are some studies which use the factors in the target side (Burlot et al, 2017;García-Martínez et al, 2016a;García-Martínez et al, 2016b). In general, their approach is to predict the roots and other morphological tags of the target words instead of producing the surface forms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the above works, there are some studies which use the factors in the target side (Burlot et al, 2017;García-Martínez et al, 2016a;García-Martínez et al, 2016b). In general, their approach is to predict the roots and other morphological tags of the target words instead of producing the surface forms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various word representations (Burlot et al, 2017) can be used in the first factor, our system predict at each timestep on the target side a normalized word and a PoS-tag. fully infl.…”
Section: Data Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%