1997
DOI: 10.1177/0142064x9701906403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word-Processing in the Ancient World: the Social Production and Performance of Q

Abstract: Discussions of the Gospels tend to ignore the pragmatics of contemporary composition. Oral performance is sometimes acknowledged, even though too clear a distinction is often drawn between oral and written communication. Here evidence for oral social composition in and for oral social performance will be adduced. If, then, as our main example, the Q community was as important in the oral formation of the collection as this oral social composition model suggests, the arbitrarily imposed 'strata' of much recent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…221-247. 2 G.F. Downing, 1997. "Word Processing in the Ancient World: Social Production and Performance of Q", JSNT 19/64, p. 30.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…221-247. 2 G.F. Downing, 1997. "Word Processing in the Ancient World: Social Production and Performance of Q", JSNT 19/64, p. 30.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this interaction is still largely unexplored in the field of the Synoptic Problem (cf. the critique in Downing 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28. If the gospel authors’ social lives were to be understood throughout time rather than fixed in time when they composed Jesus narratives, their occasion to be lecturing in temples and other public buildings would be ongoing. The publication process for any other historical text that they composed would have involved public performance (Downing 1996: 29-48), and thus enquiries into the lecturing activity of historiographers are significant if the objective is to understand gospel writers’ social situation as professional writers. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%