2024
DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2024.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word-object and action-object learning in a unimodal context during early childhood

Sarah Eiteljoerge,
Birgit Elsner,
Nivedita Mani

Abstract: Word-object and action-object learning in children aged 30 to 48 months appears to develop at a similar time scale and adheres to similar attentional constraints. However, children below 36 months show different patterns of learning word-object and action-object associations when this information is presented in a bimodal context (Eiteljoerge et al., 2019b). Here, we investigated 12- and 24-month-olds’ word-object and action-object learning when this information is presented in a unimodal context. Forty 12- an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, college-aged adults show learning of wordobject and action-object associations (Eiteljoerge et al, 2019). In a follow-up study, Eiteljoerge et al (2024) presented 1-and 2-year-olds with the same stimuli but in temporally separated blocks, and children showed the same results as in the previous study. Such findings are also consistent with research showing that young children attend to input from a single preferred modality when presented with information from two modalities (e.g., Lewkowicz, 1994;Robinson & Sloutsky, 2004;Sloutsky & Napolitano, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In contrast, college-aged adults show learning of wordobject and action-object associations (Eiteljoerge et al, 2019). In a follow-up study, Eiteljoerge et al (2024) presented 1-and 2-year-olds with the same stimuli but in temporally separated blocks, and children showed the same results as in the previous study. Such findings are also consistent with research showing that young children attend to input from a single preferred modality when presented with information from two modalities (e.g., Lewkowicz, 1994;Robinson & Sloutsky, 2004;Sloutsky & Napolitano, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%