2003
DOI: 10.1086/533242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Made Flesh: Christianity, Modernity, and Cultural Colonialism in the Work of Jean and John Comaroff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elizabeth Elbourne remarks that a dialectic model does not explain why Christianity rapidly moved 'out of the hands of the missionaries and settlers who brought it', and that 'it is not always wise to take missionaries at their word'. 45 The printed reports of missionary societies typically minimised the role that Indigenous evangelists played in spreading Christianity. In rejecting the dialectic model, historians working with the concept of entanglement have instead examined multidirectional forms of interaction, the interweaving of 'diverse historical subjects such as the body, health, religion, trade, and exchange with each other and with the material world'.…”
Section: Entangled Histories Of Mission and Religious Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elizabeth Elbourne remarks that a dialectic model does not explain why Christianity rapidly moved 'out of the hands of the missionaries and settlers who brought it', and that 'it is not always wise to take missionaries at their word'. 45 The printed reports of missionary societies typically minimised the role that Indigenous evangelists played in spreading Christianity. In rejecting the dialectic model, historians working with the concept of entanglement have instead examined multidirectional forms of interaction, the interweaving of 'diverse historical subjects such as the body, health, religion, trade, and exchange with each other and with the material world'.…”
Section: Entangled Histories Of Mission and Religious Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Elizabeth Elbourne, ‘Word Made Flesh: Christianity, Modernity, and Cultural Colonialism in the Work of Jean and John Comaroff’, The American Historical Review 108, no. 2 (2003): 444. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However they have also come to be criticized for overplaying the efficacy of the mission regime (e.g., Elbourne 2003), while in a more general sense, some historians have recently questioned the extent to which missions operated in concert with other colonial institutions, practices and movements (e.g., Etherington 2005). Nonetheless, in Australasia their influence has been evident in the persisting concern with hegemony, and the multiple role of missions as places of refuge as well as of coercion, of survival as well as transformation, and as spaces of exchange (e.g., Attwood 1989;Brock 1993;Trigger 1986Trigger , 1992.…”
Section: Missions Identity and Cultural Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of conversion to take on independent meaning is evident in the fear that the authority to evangelize would escape the control of the white missionaries. 55 Such fears were well founded. Throughout the colonial world, indigenous Christian movements erupted that were either ambivalent or hostile to the Western missionaries, and that usually involved a theologically contrived circumvention of missionary authority.…”
Section: Conversion and The Converted: Missionaries And Convert Comentioning
confidence: 99%