Contributions to the Science of Text and Language
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4068-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Length and Word Frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lexical sophistication was estimated by the average number of letters in each word (Verspoor, Schmid, & Xu 2012;Verspoor & van Dijk, 2011). Word length and word frequency are associated (Strauss, Grzybek, & Altmann, 2007); longer words are therefore considered to be more complex and sophisticated (Wolfe-Quintero, Inagaki, & Kim, 1998), and their use has repeatedly been shown to be associated with higher language proficiency (Grant & Ginther, 2000). The advantage of using word length over word frequency analyses is that the latter (e.g., Laufer & Nation, 1995) relies on general frequency lists derived from written texts that might not be appropriate for the language investigated here, that is, speech directed toward child bilingual learners.…”
Section: Transcribing and Coding The Sbr Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lexical sophistication was estimated by the average number of letters in each word (Verspoor, Schmid, & Xu 2012;Verspoor & van Dijk, 2011). Word length and word frequency are associated (Strauss, Grzybek, & Altmann, 2007); longer words are therefore considered to be more complex and sophisticated (Wolfe-Quintero, Inagaki, & Kim, 1998), and their use has repeatedly been shown to be associated with higher language proficiency (Grant & Ginther, 2000). The advantage of using word length over word frequency analyses is that the latter (e.g., Laufer & Nation, 1995) relies on general frequency lists derived from written texts that might not be appropriate for the language investigated here, that is, speech directed toward child bilingual learners.…”
Section: Transcribing and Coding The Sbr Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we show that human lexical systems are such codes, with word length primarily determined by the average amount of information a word conveys in context. The exact forms of the frequency-length relationship (3,4) and the distribution of word lengths (5) have been quantitatively evaluated previously. In contrast, information content offers an empirically supported and rationally motived alternative to Zipf's frequency-length relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous authors, even among proponents of alternative formulas, have concluded that vocabulary frequency and sentence length are the best indicators of text difficulty (see DuBay, 2004). The Flesch-Kincaid formula, included in MS Word, is based on sentence and word length, given that word length strongly correlates with word frequency with r values of up to 0.997 (Strauss, Grzybek, & Altmann, 2007).…”
Section: Text Selection Text Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%