2013
DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
707
2
72

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 920 publications
(948 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
54
707
2
72
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the above point, since the 1980s, many studies (McKeown et al, 1983;McKeown et al, 1985;Perfetti, & Stafura, 2013;Poulsen, & Elbro, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013 among others) have been conducted to find out the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Accordingly, vocabulary knowledge is a major factor which influences reading success.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the above point, since the 1980s, many studies (McKeown et al, 1983;McKeown et al, 1985;Perfetti, & Stafura, 2013;Poulsen, & Elbro, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013 among others) have been conducted to find out the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Accordingly, vocabulary knowledge is a major factor which influences reading success.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In disagreement with the models of word reading that make precise predictions (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001), reading comprehension cannot be limited to some specific models. A general framework entailing subsystems of reading comprehension is needed to encompass all the components of reading comprehension (Perfetti & Stafura, 2014).…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the literature (Hagoort & Indefrey, 2014;Hagoort & Levinson, 2014;Kintsch & Rawson, 2007;Perfetti & Stafura, 2014;Zwaan, 2015), word level processing, i.e., the processing and understanding of lexical items (e.g., words or signs), and language comprehension, i.e., understanding the meaning of one lexical item or several lexical items in a sequence (e.g., sentences), are herein assumed to represent connected albeit qualitatively different processes. Successful identification of lexical items as a language signal represents a starting level of language understanding.…”
Section: Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Sign and spoken languages are processed in a similar manner at different linguistic levels, including the sub-lexical, lexical, and syntactic (for reviews, see MacSweeney, Capek, Campbell, & Woll, 2008). Efficient language processing of spoken , sign (MacSweeney, Capek, et al, 2008), and written (Perfetti & Stafura, 2014) languages is thus likely to involve language specific knowledge, domain general knowledge and cognitive mechanisms.…”
Section: Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation