2022
DOI: 10.1177/23969415221085827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word imageability is associated with expressive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Background & aims Throughout typical development, children prioritize different perceptual, social, and linguistic cues to learn words. The earliest acquired words are often those that are perceptually salient and highly imageable. Imageability, the ease in which a word evokes a mental image, is a strong predictor for word age of acquisition in typically developing (TD) children, independent of other lexicosemantic features such as word frequency. However, little is known about the effects of imageability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linguistics researcher widely use imageability, and the facilitatory effects that high imageability have on comprehension has been documented using a wide range of methods from reaction time studies (Yap et al, 2012), to brain imaging (Wise et al, 2000) and brain lesion studies (Dubé et al, 2014). Recent novel uses of the variable include using neural networks to predict the imageability ratings of words (Bochkarev et al, 2021) and as a means of gleaning insights into the speech patterns of children with autism spectrum disorder (Lin et al, 2022). SLA researchers also often use imageability as an independent variable to predict L2 performance (e.g., Farley et al, 2012;Hasegawa, 2010).…”
Section: Imageabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistics researcher widely use imageability, and the facilitatory effects that high imageability have on comprehension has been documented using a wide range of methods from reaction time studies (Yap et al, 2012), to brain imaging (Wise et al, 2000) and brain lesion studies (Dubé et al, 2014). Recent novel uses of the variable include using neural networks to predict the imageability ratings of words (Bochkarev et al, 2021) and as a means of gleaning insights into the speech patterns of children with autism spectrum disorder (Lin et al, 2022). SLA researchers also often use imageability as an independent variable to predict L2 performance (e.g., Farley et al, 2012;Hasegawa, 2010).…”
Section: Imageabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus our perspective that touch may impact infant word learning, is motivated by a large body of work on embodied cognition showing that perceptual and motor experience impact word learning within a dynamic systems framework (e.g., Yoshida & Smith, 2008; Yu & Smith, 2012). Further, it is also informed by work with children with speech and language disorders who show sensory differences to typically developing children (e.g., children with ASD; Ben‐Sasson et al., 2022) which seem to impact their ability to acquire their lexicon (e.g., Lin et al., 2022; Tenenbaum et al., 2014; Venker et al., 2022). Thus, we explored how number of distinct sensory experiences impact the growth of the lexicon and test the hypothesis that a larger number of multisensory experiences with objects will facilitate children's learning by enriching their representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%