2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word associations contribute to machine learning in automatic scoring of degree of emotional tones in dream reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major challenge to the study of dreams is that they are typically analyzed by rating and ranking the content of verbal dream reports along various dimensions by judges ( Hall and Van De Castle, 1966 ), or by the dreamers themselves. With the exception of a few recent studies ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ), the majority of dream research has been limited to the study of subjectively scored and interpreted dream reports. However, recent advances in language processing and machine learning techniques ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ) have made the objective analysis of dream reports possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A major challenge to the study of dreams is that they are typically analyzed by rating and ranking the content of verbal dream reports along various dimensions by judges ( Hall and Van De Castle, 1966 ), or by the dreamers themselves. With the exception of a few recent studies ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ), the majority of dream research has been limited to the study of subjectively scored and interpreted dream reports. However, recent advances in language processing and machine learning techniques ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ) have made the objective analysis of dream reports possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of a few recent studies ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ), the majority of dream research has been limited to the study of subjectively scored and interpreted dream reports. However, recent advances in language processing and machine learning techniques ( Amini et al, 2011 ; Horikawa et al, 2013 ; Wong et al, 2016 ) have made the objective analysis of dream reports possible. The current study employed WordNet, a manually curated publicly available lexical database of the English language that can be used to derive the high-order meaning of words from a corpus of text, as well as the semantic distance between the higher-order senses of words with another corpus of text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, several methods of automated language analysis have been created to assist researchers with psychological inferences based on the words that people say, write, and type. In dreams research, examples exist in which researchers have developed limited and specialized computerized lexical codes for dreams for purposes such as neuropsychological modeling with brain scans (S. Schwartz & Maquet, 2002), dream cluster sequence multidimensional statistical modeling (S. Schwartz, 2004), and dream sentiment analysis (e.g., Amini, Sabourin, & DeKoninck, 2011;Razavi, Matwin, DeKoninck, & Amini, 2014). However, whereas these approaches often rely upon domainspecific psychological measurement from language, other methods exist that afford researchers more generalized psychological insights, typically achieved by measuring various classes of grammatical language (e.g., pronouns, conjunctions) and psychologically relevant categories of words (e.g., words related to active thinking and social processes).…”
Section: Automated Language Analysis Of Dream Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assessing the performance of neural networks, it is conventionally measured against the results achieved by humans as a 'gold standard' (Amini et al, 2011(Amini et al, : 1574DiMaggio, 2015: 1;Huang et al, 2012Huang et al, : 1601Jurafsky and Martin, 2018). Following this line of thinking, artificial creativity could be compared with human creativity.…”
Section: Areas In Which Neural Network Underperformmentioning
confidence: 99%