2015
DOI: 10.1080/00405167.2015.1108543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wool metrology research and development to date

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cottle and Baxter (2015) show CL from 0.21 to 0.85, from 0.25 to 0.82 and from 0.33 to 092 µm for Laserscan, OFDA and Airflow, respectively. Likewise, the increase of SD, standard error, and CI is according to the findings of other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cottle and Baxter (2015) show CL from 0.21 to 0.85, from 0.25 to 0.82 and from 0.33 to 092 µm for Laserscan, OFDA and Airflow, respectively. Likewise, the increase of SD, standard error, and CI is according to the findings of other researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For coarser fibres, accuracy declines to 1.317 µm, although this value is within the range accepted by the International Wool Textile Organization. Accuracy could be improved with good calibration using regression models (Cottle & Baxter, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These physical properties directly affect the speed of processing, processing yield, quantity of waste products, yarn quality, dyeing performance, visual attributes, handle attributes, fabric properties, cost of product, and appeal to customer. Cottle and Baxter (2015) reviewed the testing requirements for important physical properties of wool.…”
Section: Introduction To Wool Production and Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to measure fiber diameter of wool samples with a high accuracy, precision and quickness [5]. Currently, there are a few instruments in use to measure fiber diameter of either greasy or clean wool samples at wool center laboratory and warehouse [6]; however, those were lack of portability, price affordability, measurable limitation, and inflexibility for field use on farms. Although OFDA, FIBER EC and Laserscan are main instruments currently used in industry but they are not portable and are very expensive [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%