2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2009.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Woody vegetation structure in conserved versus communal land in a biodiversity hotspot: A case study in Maputaland, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant reduction in woody plant height on HU corresponds to a decline found in a communal area compared to conservation areas in Maputaland (Gaugris and van Rooyen 2010), and in areas with greater disturbance within communal land of the lowveld (Shackleton et al 1994) and in C. mopane savanna in northern Namibia (Strohbach 2000a). LiDAR data has confirmed a decrease in mean height of woody vegetation on the communal lands adjacent to the southern Kruger National Park (Fisher et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The significant reduction in woody plant height on HU corresponds to a decline found in a communal area compared to conservation areas in Maputaland (Gaugris and van Rooyen 2010), and in areas with greater disturbance within communal land of the lowveld (Shackleton et al 1994) and in C. mopane savanna in northern Namibia (Strohbach 2000a). LiDAR data has confirmed a decrease in mean height of woody vegetation on the communal lands adjacent to the southern Kruger National Park (Fisher et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After five to seven years of cropping, the land is fallowed for at least twenty years. It has been shown in a neighbouring area that such duration is sufficient for a tree cover to establish (Gaugris and van Rooyen 2010). Consequently, when fallow land is brought into cultivation for the second time, it is a wooded land which needs to be cleared again.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses in the current study were conducted to provide further insight into the results provided by the utilisation study. A total of 77 rectangular plots of varying lengths (25-50 m) and widths (4-10 m), depending on vegetation density (Gaugris and Van Rooyen 2010a), were sampled with 59 plots in Tembe and 18 in Tshanini. The numbers of plots per site were proportional to the total forest area within the sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tembe, a 30,000 ha statutorily conserved area, was proclaimed in 1983 with the dual mandate to conserve wildlife and protect Sand Forest, and was fully fenced off in 1989 (Matthews et al 2001)-an act that completely precluded human utilisation of natural resources in the reserve thereafter. Since 1989, wildlife populations have increased steadily (Gaugris and Van Rooyen 2010a), especially those of browsers such as kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros and nyala Tragelaphus angasii, but also megaherbivores such as elephants Loxodonta africana.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%