2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Woody macroremains from the Acheulian site of Torralba: Occurrence and palaeoecology of Pinus cf. sylvestris in the Middle Pleistocene of the Iberian Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Cerralbo period, wood remains were recovered, studied by Howell and his team, who highlighted the presence of traces of anthropic origin in nine of them, as well as evidence of the use of fire (Howell, 1966;Howell et al, 1962). However, a recent review carried out by Postigo-Mijarra et al (2017), has rejected any evidence of the anthropic processing of these remains, taxonomically identified as Pinus cf. sylvestris.…”
Section: The Torralba Archaeological Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Cerralbo period, wood remains were recovered, studied by Howell and his team, who highlighted the presence of traces of anthropic origin in nine of them, as well as evidence of the use of fire (Howell, 1966;Howell et al, 1962). However, a recent review carried out by Postigo-Mijarra et al (2017), has rejected any evidence of the anthropic processing of these remains, taxonomically identified as Pinus cf. sylvestris.…”
Section: The Torralba Archaeological Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of black pine and / or scots pine at this site represents the earliest evidence in Iberia of its use as fuel. While cryophilous pines (Pinus nigra, P. sylvestris, P. mugo, P. uncinata) are easily distinguishable from thermophilous pines (Schweingruber 1976), difficulties arise when attempting to distinguish between the different species of highland pines (Allué, Solé, and Burguet-Coca 2016;Badal and Carrión 2001;Badal et al 2012a;Badal, Villaverde, and Zilhão 2012b;Postigo-Mijarra, Gómez-Manzaneque, and Morla 2017;Vidal-Matutano et al 2015). Taking into account the anatomy of the wood, the discrimination of these four species is barely feasible, although Pinus mugo and Pinus uncinata can be discarded based on the location of the site at a low altitude, since these two species are limited to higher elevations (above 1900-2000 m a.s.l.).…”
Section: Palaeoecological Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%