Wood supply chain risks and risk mitigation strategies: A systematic review focusing on the Northern hemisphere

Auer, Veronika; Rauch, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106001

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 107 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mzougui et al (2020) divided supply chain risks into product characteristics, suppliers, transportation, financial risks, processing equipment and process realization [64]. Auer and Rauch (2021) classified supply chain risks into two categories: external risks and internal risks [65]. Zou et al (2021) divided green supply chain risks into external risks, internal risks and other risks, with 'other risks' including information factors, contract factors, default factors, environmental awareness and green design capabilities [66].…”

Section: Sustainable Supply Chain Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Integrated QFD-MCDM Approach to Strengthen Supply Chain Agility for Mitigating Sustainable Risks

Hsu

Chang

et al. 2022

Mathematics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the global economy develops and the complexity of supply chains increases, the effective mitigation of sustainable supply chain risks in electronics manufacturing has become important. While quality function deployment (QFD) has been successfully applied to many fields of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM), there is a lack of research on constructing a house-of-quality model that can be combined with MCDM for connecting supply chain agility with sustainable supply chain risks, especially in the field of electronics manufacturing. The objective of this study was to develop an integrated framework of QFD and MCDM and to devise an effective method to mitigate sustainable supply chain risks by improving supply chain agility. Such a method can help the multinational electronics manufacturing industry to develop stable and sustainable supply chains. In a multinational electronic manufacturing enterprise as an example, the results showed that the case enterprise work should focus on improving agility ‘production and sales capability’, ‘quick decision-making/strategic flexibility’, ‘electronic shiapment of finished products to control shipment operations’, ‘supplier on-time delivery rates’ and ‘cost minimization’. Improving agility would help enhance the ‘credibility and competence of operators and leaders’ and ‘product safety and quality’ and reduce ‘goods disruption or delay due to inadequate supply mobility and poor financial performance’, ‘information system instability’, the ‘long product lead time’ and other key sustainable supply chain risks. The proposed framework can not only be effectively used by other electronics manufacturers to develop agile strategies to mitigate sustainable supply chain risks, but also provides a reference for risk management for manufacturers in other fields.

show abstract

Section: Sustainable Supply Chain Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Integrated QFD-MCDM Approach to Strengthen Supply Chain Agility for Mitigating Sustainable Risks

Hsu

Chang

et al. 2022

Mathematics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Signs in this direction have been started by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) with Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance guidelines of FAO [90]. The forestry sector will go in the same direction [85,91] and the comparisons between suppliers will be more important [92,93]. Supply chain sustainability will require to systematize research results, mainly in developing countries, at least the minimal descriptions about the common set of environmental categories used in an LCI assessment [94,96].…”

Section: Eroi Carbon Footprint and Other Footprintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Availability and Environmental Performance of Wood for a Second-Generation Biorefinery

Rachid-Casnati¹,

Resquín²,

Carrasco-Letelier³

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current Global Climate Change, the 2030 Agenda and the Planetary boundaries have driven new development strategies, such as the circular economy, bioeconomy and biorefineries. In this framework, this study analyzes the potential availability and sustainability of the wood supply chain for a small-scale biorefinery aiming at producing 280–300 L of bioethanol per ton dry biomass, consuming 30,000 t of dry biomass per year harvested in a 50 km radius. This wood production goal was assessed from Eucalyptus grandis stands planted for solid wood in northeastern Uruguay. Moreover, to understand the environmental performance of this biomass supply chain, the energy return on investment (EROI), carbon footprint (CF) and potential soil erosion were also assessed. The results showed that the potential wood production would supply an average of 81,800 t of dry mass per year, maintaining the soil erosion below the upper threshold recommended, an EROI of 2.3 and annual CF of 1.22 kg CO2-eq m–3 (2.6 g CO2-eq MJ–1). Combined with the environmental performance of the bioethanol biorefinery facility, these results would show acceptable values of sustainability according to EU Directive 2009/28/ec because the bioethanol CF becomes 1.7% of this petrol’s CF.

show abstract

“…Signs in this direction have been shown by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) with Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance guidelines of FAO [92]. The forestry sector will go in the same direction [87,93], and the comparisons between suppliers will increase in relevance [94,95]. Supply chain sustainability will require one to systematize research results, mainly in developing countries, at least the minimal descriptions about the common set of environmental categories used in an LCI assessment [96,97].…”

Section: Eroi Carbon Footprint and Other Footprintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Availability and Environmental Performance of Wood for a Second-Generation Biorefinery

Rachid-Casnati

Resquín

Carrasco-Letelier

2021

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current global climate change, the 2030 Agenda, and the planetary boundaries have driven new development strategies, such as the circular economy, bioeconomy, and biorefineries. In this framework, this study analyzes the potential availability and sustainability of the wood supply chain for a small-scale biorefinery aiming at producing 280–300 L of bioethanol per ton of dry biomass, consuming 30,000 t of dry biomass per year harvested in a 50 km radius. This wood production goal was assessed from Eucalyptus grandis stands planted for solid wood in northeastern Uruguay. Moreover, to understand the environmental performance of this biomass supply chain, the energy return on investment (EROI), carbon footprint (CF), and potential soil erosion were also assessed. The results showed that the potential wood production would supply an average of 81,800 t of dry mass per year, maintaining the soil erosion below the upper threshold recommended, an EROI of 2.3, and annual CF of 1.22 kg CO2−eq m−3 (2.6 g CO2−eq MJ−1). Combined with the environmental performance of the bioethanol biorefinery facility, these results would show acceptable values of sustainability according to EU Directive 2009/28/ec because the bioethanol CF becomes 1.7% of this petrol’s CF.

show abstract

Wood supply chain risks and risk mitigation strategies: A systematic review focusing on the Northern hemisphere

Cited by 16 publications

References 107 publications

Applying Integrated QFD-MCDM Approach to Strengthen Supply Chain Agility for Mitigating Sustainable Risks

Applying Integrated QFD-MCDM Approach to Strengthen Supply Chain Agility for Mitigating Sustainable Risks

Availability and Environmental Performance of Wood for a Second-Generation Biorefinery

Availability and Environmental Performance of Wood for a Second-Generation Biorefinery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About