2013
DOI: 10.1108/jfp-09-2012-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women who use secure services: applying the literature to women with learning disabilities

Abstract: Acknowledgements: Thank you to my PhD supervisors, Professor Carol Thomas and Dr Celia Roberts for their comments on earlier drafts of this literature review. 2 AbstractPurpose: This paper reviews research of relevance to women with learning disabilities, focusing in particular on literature which is applicable to women with learning disabilities who use forensic services. Approach:Research involving women with learning disabilities over the past 30 years was sought out and reviewed, and literature relating to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It, therefore, seems surprising that conversely, the evidence base regarding and adapted DBT programmes, such as the I Can Feel Good programme (Ingamells and Morrissey, 2014), focuses mainly upon male populations. Despite the growing literature regarding the experiences of females within inpatient mental health, there is a paucity of literature exploring women with ID in such settings (Fish, 2013). Hellenbach et al (2015) also highlight the paucity of research regarding specific service provision for female offenders with ID and additional mental health needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, therefore, seems surprising that conversely, the evidence base regarding and adapted DBT programmes, such as the I Can Feel Good programme (Ingamells and Morrissey, 2014), focuses mainly upon male populations. Despite the growing literature regarding the experiences of females within inpatient mental health, there is a paucity of literature exploring women with ID in such settings (Fish, 2013). Hellenbach et al (2015) also highlight the paucity of research regarding specific service provision for female offenders with ID and additional mental health needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we collaborated with a NHS hospital that further specializes in the care and treatment of people with a Learning Disability. We focused especially on the women in this service, who typically suffer from significant mental health problems (67% of female offenders with an Intellectual Disability in MSUs are diagnosed with a mental disorder [22]) and represent one of the most vulnerable patient groups. In addition to referrals by the criminal justice system, women also get admitted by community or mental health services [37] not because of any offending behavior, but due to the severity of their self-harming acts, or aggression towards other people or property that demand this higher level of secure care [22].…”
Section: Context: Women In Medium Secure Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…extreme shame, panic or rage) to phases of euphoria, causing feelings of irritability, depression and anxiety [36]. In attempting to cope with intense negative emotions, the women tend to engage in behaviors that promise immediate relief or distraction, often displaying anger outbursts and violent behaviors; or engaging in self-harming behaviors such as cutting oneself, ingesting objects into the body, or self-neglect [35,22]. Rooted in unpredictable emotional responses, they also exhibit a variety of cognitive disturbances that disrupt the development of their sense of self.…”
Section: Context: Women In Medium Secure Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, perhaps, attributable to the forensic focus of the research; heavily weighted towards men in general (Lippold, 2016). This reflects the paucity of research regarding specific service provision for female offenders with ID and additional mental health needs (Hellenbach et al, 2015;Fish, 2013). Initial evaluation of the ICFG programme allowed for comparison across two groups, findings of which indicated subtle gender differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%