2002
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women, sex, and HIV: Social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research.

Abstract: This article is focused on examining social and contextual factors related to HIV-risk behavior for women. Specifically, this article has three main purposes: to review the literature on selected social and contextual factors that contribute to the risk for the heterosexual transmission of HIV and AIDS, to review and conduct a meta-analysis of HIV-prevention interventions targeting adult heterosexual populations, and to suggest future directions for HIV-prevention intervention research and practice. Results su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
309
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 400 publications
(620 reference statements)
9
309
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The average effect size for obesity prevention programs (r = .04) is also similar to the average effect size observed for prevention programs for other public health problems, such as smoking (r = .07; Hwang, Yeagley, & Petosa, 2004), substance abuse (r = .05; Tobler et al, 2000), HIV (r = .05; Logan et al, 2002), and eating disorders (r = .12; Stice & Shaw, 2004). This broader pattern of modest average returns for prevention programs aimed at a variety of health behaviors implies that most prevention programs are only minimally effective in reducing maladaptive health behaviors.…”
Section: Summary Of Effect Sizessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The average effect size for obesity prevention programs (r = .04) is also similar to the average effect size observed for prevention programs for other public health problems, such as smoking (r = .07; Hwang, Yeagley, & Petosa, 2004), substance abuse (r = .05; Tobler et al, 2000), HIV (r = .05; Logan et al, 2002), and eating disorders (r = .12; Stice & Shaw, 2004). This broader pattern of modest average returns for prevention programs aimed at a variety of health behaviors implies that most prevention programs are only minimally effective in reducing maladaptive health behaviors.…”
Section: Summary Of Effect Sizessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…52,53 Among poor or druginvolved women, safer sex concerns are likely to fall far below pressing survival priorities. 10,15,54 Thus, the development of interventions that impact the risk environment of drug-involved women and increase economic opportunity and independence are needed. 55 Race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with differences in unprotected sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the established link between drug and alcohol use and increased risk for HIV transmission, 9,15 women with substance use disorders are a particularly vulnerable population. The social and economic context in which alcohol and drugs are used also increases sexual risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some women are reluctant to insist on using a condom for fear that their partner will get angry [55] or will interpret this insistence as an accusation of infidelity [12]. As a result, these women avoid the negotiation to prevent conflicts that threaten the future of their relationship [56]. Thus, lack of control in the sexual domain appears to be a key determinant in condom use, and hence in exposure to HIV infection [6,57].…”
Section: Men's Control Over Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%