2023
DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2023.2252981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s risk assessments and the gendering of online IPED cultures and communities

Ellen Sverkersson,
Jesper Andreasson,
April Henning
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, men involved in PIED use are often perceived as adhering excessively to stereotypical notions of masculinity, emphasizing traits like muscularity, performance, dominance, and rationalized lifestyles. However, an issue that scholars have raised with the application of this framing of masculinity is that it can lead to an almost absolute and unquestioned understanding of power dynamics, particularly regarding men's dominance over women (Sverkersson et al, 2023). Such viewpoints contrast sharply with alternative forms of resistance discussed in critical studies on both men and masculinity (Latham et al, 2019) as well as women and gendered notions of PIED use (Fomiatti et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, men involved in PIED use are often perceived as adhering excessively to stereotypical notions of masculinity, emphasizing traits like muscularity, performance, dominance, and rationalized lifestyles. However, an issue that scholars have raised with the application of this framing of masculinity is that it can lead to an almost absolute and unquestioned understanding of power dynamics, particularly regarding men's dominance over women (Sverkersson et al, 2023). Such viewpoints contrast sharply with alternative forms of resistance discussed in critical studies on both men and masculinity (Latham et al, 2019) as well as women and gendered notions of PIED use (Fomiatti et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%