2006
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1100220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women's Rights in Development

Abstract: Joanna Kerr1 sets out the main issues facing the women's rights movements today as she answers the question for the 1,800 women who were gathered in Bangkok, about ‘why are we here’. She outlines the collective vision and spirit of the AWID2 Forum as a space for women's rights leaders and activists from all over the world to come together to share experiences, to laugh, to be challenged and inspired, to strategize on how to make positive changes and, most of all, to celebrate. Development (2006) 49, 6–11. doi:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past studies reveal evidence of intolerance toward women. For example, Kerr (2006) argued that economic development has marginalized women while Horton (1999) considers economic development improving women's welfare. Boserup (1970) argued that discrimination against women increases as a result of the growth process; women get excluded from participating in the modern sector.…”
Section: Tolerance From a Modern Economics Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies reveal evidence of intolerance toward women. For example, Kerr (2006) argued that economic development has marginalized women while Horton (1999) considers economic development improving women's welfare. Boserup (1970) argued that discrimination against women increases as a result of the growth process; women get excluded from participating in the modern sector.…”
Section: Tolerance From a Modern Economics Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the realization of rights is in their enjoyment; a formal recognition of an entitlement unrealized for individual, social, political, or economic reasons is not the enjoyment of the right. Such obstacles may be the result of structural patterns or individual circumstances against the backdrop 25 (Vargas 2006;Kerr 2006;Enslin and Tjiattas 2006;Croll 2006;Cornwall and Molyneux 2006;Bradshaw 2006;CorrÍa 2005;Chen 2005;Uvin 2004). 26 (Petchesky 2003).…”
Section: Universal Human Rights Enjoymentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21 They are reaching to delegitimize colonial legacies of race, 22 heteronormativity, gender, and other systems of privilege and discrimination. No one reaches for 15 The argument might be applied specifically to the field of development, global health, or gender and political participation (Vargas 2006;Kerr 2006;Enslin and Tjiattas 2006;Croll 2006;Cornwall and Molyneux 2006;Bradshaw 2006;CorrÍa 2005;Chen 2005;Uvin 2004). For a way of measuring rights enjoyment for the purposes of statistical political science of human rights enjoyment see Ackerly and Jose Miguel Cruz (2010 GAOR, 34th Sess., Supp.…”
Section: Universal Human Rights Enjoymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refl ections on and celebrations of the progress made by women and in gender relations in recent decades are always tempered by the realisation that change is never linear, and that current circumstances and trends are full of intractable problems and new threats (Kerr 2006).…”
Section: 'Gender Talk Is Everywhere'mentioning
confidence: 99%