2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women's Reproductive Rights Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A State-Level Analysis to Assess the Role of Race and Nativity Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 , 66–68 Others note the need to understand the intersection of race, nativity, and immigration status in health research, 4 , 102 , 105 , 106 and emerging research describes the salience of this intersection for maternal and infant health outcomes. 107–109 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 66–68 Others note the need to understand the intersection of race, nativity, and immigration status in health research, 4 , 102 , 105 , 106 and emerging research describes the salience of this intersection for maternal and infant health outcomes. 107–109 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A national analysis by Coles et al revealed that Black teenagers living in states with Medicaid funding restrictions were four times more likely to experience an unintended birth [ 69 ]. Lastly, Sudhinaraset and colleagues found that LBW risk was 8% lower among Black women living in states with the least restrictive reproductive rights policies, compared to counterparts living in the most restrictive states [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of studies have demonstrated that restrictive abortion policies (or other policies governing reproductive rights) are associated with decreased access to abortion care for people of color and those with lower SES [ 67 , 68 ] and increased risks of unintended teen births [ 69 ] and low birthweight among Black women [ 53 ]. Given the landscape of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequities in birth outcomes in the U.S. [ 70 – 86 ], policies restricting access to abortion have the potential to exacerbate adverse birth outcomes, as well as inequities in said outcomes, for people of color and those with lower SES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We controlled for individual-and time-varying state-level demographic, economic, political, and policy characteristics that the structural determinants of health framework and existing literature suggest may be associated with either adverse birth outcomes or state policymaking decisions (Austin & Harper, 2019;Bitler & Zavodny, 2001;Blank, George, & London, 1996;Crear-Perry et al, 2021;Hawkins et al, 2020;Levine, Trainor, & Zimmerman, 1996;Medoff, 2012;New, 2011;Oakley, 2003;Pabayo et al, 2020;Sen, Wingate, & Kirby, 2012;Sudhinaraset, Vilda, Gipson, Bornstein, & Wallace, 2020;Wallace et al, 2017). At the individual level, we controlled for pregnant parent sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., age, race, ethnicity, education level, marital status) and health risk factors (i.e., number of births and prenatal care visits, diabetes, chronic hypertension, pregnancy-associated hypertension, and eclampsia) and infant characteristics (i.e., sex and plurality) using data from the Period Linked Birth-Infant Death files.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%