Women's Perspectives on Harm and Justice after Online Harassment

Abstract

Social media platforms aspire to create online experiences where users can participate safely and equitably. However, women around the world experience widespread online harassment, including insults, stalking, aggression, threats, and non-consensual sharing of sexual photos. This article describes women's perceptions of harm associated with online harassment and preferred platform responses to that harm. We conducted a survey in 14 geographic regions around the world (N = 3,993), focusing on regions whose perspectives have been insufficiently elevated in social media governance decisions (e.g. Mongolia, Cameroon). Results show that, on average, women perceive greater harm associated with online harassment than men, especially for non-consensual image sharing. Women also prefer most platform responses compared to men, especially removing content and banning users; however, women are less favorable towards payment as a response. Addressing global gender-based violence online requires understanding how women experience online harms and how they wish for it to be addressed. This is especially important given that the people who build and govern technology are not typically those who are most likely to experience online harms.

Counterspeakers’ Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate

“…The risk of intervening against online hate speech can also be exacerbated by gender roles and other identities of the intervener [142,144]. While AI and algorithmic tools for moderation and flagging have been developed to alleviate online harassment and burden of moderators [6], they have shown to have varying levels of effectiveness [111] especially for marginalized communities who perceive greater harms associated with online harassment [68]. Along with improving existing methods and tools, further support in harassment reporting (e.g., collecting evidence or adding context) and recovery support could be assisted by AI-enhanced tools [50].…”

Bridging Theory & Practice: Examining the State of Scholarship Using the History of Trust and Safety Archive

“…The experiences of users, particularly negative experiences, are highlighted to demonstrate perceived oversights and problems with listed policy and platform governance documentation. A majority of investigations in this review centered on observing user data, mostly text-based posts on social media platforms (Chatzakou et al 2017) or interviews (Jhaver et al 2022) and surveys (Im et al 2022) with users.…”

Dynamics of gender-based violence in Scopus Indexed Publication 2014-2024: A bibliometric analysis

“…In the red cluster (E. J. Kavanagh et al, 2023) is a researcher who is connected to many other researchers because it has 9 network branches and is also connected to researchers from outside the cluster, namely (Fenton et al, 2023;Im et al, 2022;Phipps, 2022).…”