Women’s freedom of movement and participation in psychosocial support groups: qualitative study in northern India

Abstract

Background Depression, the world’s leading cause of disability, disproportionately affects women. Women in India, one of the most gender unequal countries worldwide, face systemic gender disadvantage that significantly increases the risk of common mental disorders. This study’s objective was to examine the factors influencing women’s participation in psychosocial support groups, within an approach where community members work together to collectively strengthen their community’s mental health. Methods This community-based qualitative study was conducted from May to July 2016, across three peri-urban sites in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, Northern India. Set within an NGO-run mental health project, data were collected through focus group discussions with individuals involved in psychosocial support groups including women with psychosocial disabilities as well as caregivers ( N = 10, representing 59 women), and key informant interviews ( N = 8) with community members and mental health professionals. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results The principal barrier to participating in psychosocial support groups was restrictions on women’s freedom of movement. Women in the community are not normally permitted to leave home, unless going to market or work, making it difficult for women to leave their home to participate in the groups. The restrictions emanated from the overall community’s attitude toward gender relations, the women’s own internalized gender expectations, and most significantly, the decision-making power of husbands and mothers-in-law. Other factors including employment and education shaped women’s ability to participate in psychosocial support groups; however, the role of these additional factors must be understood in connection to a gender order limiting women’s freedom of movement. Conclusions Mental health access and gender inequality are inseparable in the context of Northern India, and women’s mental health cannot be addressed without first addressing underlying gender relations. Community-based mental health programs are an effective tool and can be used to strengthen communities collectively; however, attention towards the gender constraints that restrict women’s freedom of movement and their ability to access care is required. To our knowledge, this is the first study to clearly document and analyze the connection between access to community mental health services in South Asia and women’s freedom of movement. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7019-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

“We’ve got through hard times before” : acute mental distress and coping among disadvantaged groups during COVID-19 lockdown in North India - a qualitative study

“…Informal settlements in urban Dehradun are densely populated with temporary housing, and water taps and sanitation outside of homes. Both locations operate under a dominant patriarchy that favours men and disadvantages women [ 33 – 35 ]. While the National Mental health programme (NMHP) was sanctioned in 2016 across Uttarakhand, there are fewer than 10 Government psychiatrists for this state of 10 million people and none in Nae Tehri district.…”

Exploring Community Mental Health Systems – A Participatory Health Needs and Assets Assessment in the Yamuna Valley, North India

“…41,50,51 The NMHP and mental health services nationally could build on the widely available asset of natural environments across rural India, to ease mental distress by including interventions such as green exercise and therapy building in natural spaces, 52 while taking into account structural obstacles such as limited freedom of movement for women in North India for this. 53 Secondly, this study underlines the importance of social determinants such as gender and caste, for mental health. There have been wide calls for the health policy nationally, 54 and specific programmes such as the NMHP to increase focus on social determinants and equity in mental health, 19,49 Possible policy responses include facilitating engagement between civil society, researchers and policy-makers to understand and theorise action on social determinants, equity and policy action in mental health in the State [54][55][56] ; and ensuring monitoring of the NMHP includes measures of equity such as access to care and use of essential medicines among people such as migrant labourers, people with disabilities and Dalit people.…”

Mixed methods process evaluation of the Sundara Grama intervention promoting latrine use and safe disposal in rural Odisha, India

“…As a result, female mobilizers were subjected to social backlash, including cat calling and public shaming. Other studies in India and Pakistan have also documented how restrictive gender norms limit the ability for women to both participate in and carry-out public health programs (22)(23)(24). Program evaluations do not always consider the implementer experience, but implementers must operate within the same cultural norms as participants and it is vital to understand how those norms may affect their role or lead to unintended harm.…”