2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-014-9621-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s Exposure to Psychological Abuse: Does That Experience Predict Mental Health Outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For those couples, psychological intimate partner violence (P‐IPV) could result from the escalation of dysfunctional verbal interactions (Bartholomew & Cobb, ). P‐IPV, defined as the use of verbal and nonverbal communication with the intent to emotionally harm and/or exert control over one's partner (Breiding, Basile, Smith, Black, & Mahendra, ), has been recognized as one of the most frequent and debilitating form of interpersonal violence with regards to one's physical and psychological health (Rogers & Follingstad, ). Even in its less severe and often normalized forms (e.g., insulting, yelling), P‐IPV is considered as particularly detrimental as it tends to evoke retaliation and rapidly escalates into more severe violent behaviors (Winstok, ).…”
Section: A Dyadic Perspective On Psychological Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those couples, psychological intimate partner violence (P‐IPV) could result from the escalation of dysfunctional verbal interactions (Bartholomew & Cobb, ). P‐IPV, defined as the use of verbal and nonverbal communication with the intent to emotionally harm and/or exert control over one's partner (Breiding, Basile, Smith, Black, & Mahendra, ), has been recognized as one of the most frequent and debilitating form of interpersonal violence with regards to one's physical and psychological health (Rogers & Follingstad, ). Even in its less severe and often normalized forms (e.g., insulting, yelling), P‐IPV is considered as particularly detrimental as it tends to evoke retaliation and rapidly escalates into more severe violent behaviors (Winstok, ).…”
Section: A Dyadic Perspective On Psychological Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 and 0 . 94 ).19 Rogers and Follingstad [56] Global Perceived Harm ( PH ) Eight - item scale measuring believed effect of partners psychological maltreatment on psychological , physical and/or daily functioning as well as negative perception of relationship and world in general . Scored on 5 - point Likert scale from “ a little ” to “ a lot ”. A scale reflecting impacts from women ’ s experience with battering and negative changes seen in oneself and one ’ s relationship . Reliability statistic of 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the present study show that women who had a sex partner ever threaten violence against them , a sex partner ever attempt violence against them , a sex partner ever become violent or had unwanted sex with a partner self-reported 14 or more mentally unhealthy days more than women who had not experienced IPV in these forms. Being threatened by a sexual partner is a form of psychological abuse experienced by IPV victims ( Rogers & Follingstad, 2014 ). Rogers and Follingstad (2014) assessed whether or not psychological abuse predicted mental health outcomes and concluded that women can report symptoms of anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation if they are threatened by their partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being threatened by a sexual partner is a form of psychological abuse experienced by IPV victims ( Rogers & Follingstad, 2014 ). Rogers and Follingstad (2014) assessed whether or not psychological abuse predicted mental health outcomes and concluded that women can report symptoms of anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation if they are threatened by their partner. In regard to physical violence, having a sexual partner ever attempt to become violent or become violent has a direct effect on the mental health of female victims ( Karakurt et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%