Women's collective constructions of embodied practices through memory work: Cartesian dualism in memories of sweating and pain

Abstract

The research presented in this paper uses memory work as a method to explore six women's collective constructions of two embodied practices, sweating and pain. The paper identifies limitations in the ways in which social constructionist research has theorized the relationship between discourse and materiality, and it proposes an approach to the study of embodiment which enjoins, rather than bridges, the discursive and the non-discursive. The paper presents an analysis of 25 memories of sweating and pain which suggests that Cartesian dualism is central to the women's accounts of their experiences. However, such dualism does not operate as a stable organizing principle. Rather, it offers two strategies for the performance of a split between mind and body. The paper traces the ways in which dualism can be both functional and restrictive, and explores the tensions between these two forms. The paper concludes by identifiying opportunities and limitations associated with memory work as a method for studying embodiment.

Older Women and Everyday Talk about the Ageing Body

“…Obviously, this dualism may be perpetuated by the sheer limitations of spoken language at expressing the physical sensations of the body. Foucauldian discourse analysis as a method to research the ageing body is using body talk to access body materiality so it could be argued the meaning of embodiment, how social and cultural processes shape the individual's lived experience of the body, cannot be truly identified (Gillies et al, 2004;Paulson, 2005). Qualitative research using methods such as Foucauldian discourse analysis, focus on the processes through which individuals negotiate identities for their ageing bodies.…”

Feeling the Way: Qualitative Clinical Research and the Affective Turn

“…This powerful method involves collective discursive analysis of accounts of experience in which the distinction between researcher and participants is dissolved: the researcher is simply a group member, and all participants are co-researchers. It has already been used with some success to explore both emotion (Crawford et al 1992) and embodiment (Gillies et al 2004), although it sometimes fails to yield the kinds of insights expected (Brown et al 2011). However, the striking differences of status and power typically separating service users from professionals will limit its use in qualitative clinical research unless suggestions for service user research (e.g., Harper 2008) get enacted.…”

“I Allow Myself to FEEL Now …”: Adolescent Girls' Negotiations of Embodied Knowing, the Female Body, and Literacy

“…Embodiment is an accomplishment that involves both a negotiation and composition of physical as well as discursive space. The process is dynamic and reciprocal, involving continual movements between bodily organization and expression, as well as discursive accounting for them (Gillies, Harden, Johnson, Reavey, Strange, & Willig, 2004). Embodiment is taken to be a socio-material practice that produces "knowing locations" (Mulcahy, 2000).…”