2017
DOI: 10.1080/09612025.2017.1346880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s agency, activism and organisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Healthcare organizations and the healthcare system have a lot to say in enabling or constraining nurses' agency in the microspaces of practice (Nairn, 2009 ). This dual perspective avoids blaming approaches which are so frequent in nursing (Perron et al, 2014 ) by focusing on the narratives of nurses' actions over the forms of power defining their status (Hutchinson et al, 2018 ; Lee & Logan, 2019 ). Theorizing agency in this way needs to be taken into account to understand how nurses reflect and act upon structures that have not placed them as peers in healthcare organizations and in the healthcare system, and to understand to what extent these structures are capable of working as means for nurses' emancipation (Alvesson & Willmott, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare organizations and the healthcare system have a lot to say in enabling or constraining nurses' agency in the microspaces of practice (Nairn, 2009 ). This dual perspective avoids blaming approaches which are so frequent in nursing (Perron et al, 2014 ) by focusing on the narratives of nurses' actions over the forms of power defining their status (Hutchinson et al, 2018 ; Lee & Logan, 2019 ). Theorizing agency in this way needs to be taken into account to understand how nurses reflect and act upon structures that have not placed them as peers in healthcare organizations and in the healthcare system, and to understand to what extent these structures are capable of working as means for nurses' emancipation (Alvesson & Willmott, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradox is the question of why women participate in religious organizations that seemingly oppose their individual freedoms. While the earliest research on women and gender-conservative religions viewed women as simply submitting to the authority of the religion, this approach was reframed as work on agency and women’s behavior within patriarchal society overall, and women’s agency in religion, in particular, advanced (Avishai 2008; Lee and Logan 2019; Meyers 2002). Instead of examining the power of the structure of religion, the focus of current research examines how, within that structure, the individual is still agentic.…”
Section: Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%