2003
DOI: 10.1177/1077801202250072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s Accounts of Domestic Violence Versus Tactics-Based Outcome Categories

Abstract: This study compared battered women's accounts of violence with tactics-based outcomes to assess the measurement limitations in predicting recurring violence. Accounts of 536 incidents were collected from 299 women at batterer program intake and at 3-month intervals over a 15-month follow-up. Each incident was coded using a sequential, situational model of violence, and the incident codings were summarized for each woman. The components of violent incidents did not correspond to any particular tactics-based out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We did find corroboration of our reassault categories using capture-recapture analysis (Gondolf, Chang, & LaPorte, 1999), and cross-tabulations with injury and impacts. However, an attempt to correlate the pattern of abuse conveyed in the women's accounts of violence did not substantially correlate with our reassault outcomes (Gondolf & Beeman, 1999). Further development of outcome categories may, therefore, improve prediction more substantially.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…We did find corroboration of our reassault categories using capture-recapture analysis (Gondolf, Chang, & LaPorte, 1999), and cross-tabulations with injury and impacts. However, an attempt to correlate the pattern of abuse conveyed in the women's accounts of violence did not substantially correlate with our reassault outcomes (Gondolf & Beeman, 1999). Further development of outcome categories may, therefore, improve prediction more substantially.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…(), Åsling‐Monemi, Tabassum & Persson (), Silverman, Gupta, Decker, Kapur & Raj () and Rahman, Hoque & Makinoda () exclusively rely on quantitative tools and techniques. Arguably, quantitative measures may permit researchers to define the acts that contribute to an understanding of the types of violence, but fail to accurately represent the experiences of the participants (Gondolf & Beeman, ). Accurately quantifying issues related to domestic violence is often difficult and does not provide sufficient rigor, because they are inextricably linked with socio‐cultural contexts, norms, beliefs, and practices (Shaikh, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when couples have been selected for severe male-to-female violence, partners view their behavior as reactions to each other, and mutual escalation precedes violence (Winstok & Eisikovits, 2008). Women who report severe PV by their partners rarely comply with their partner's wishes in violent altercations, and most report fighting back physically (e.g., Gondolf & Beeman, 2003;Goodman, Dutton, Weinfurt, & Cook, 2003). Thus, PV generally arises in a context of mutual conflict.…”
Section: Situational Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%