2021
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1910672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women perception of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy and subsequent maternal anxiety: a prospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23–25 However, the finding is much lower when compared with previous studies conducted in different countries. 1,26–29 The discrepancy in the above finding might be attributable to the study setting difference where our study employed face-to-face interviews, whereas the other studies were web-based surveys. Besides, since our study participants were pregnant women, more negative responses could occur as pregnant women might have apprehension of vaccine effect on pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…23–25 However, the finding is much lower when compared with previous studies conducted in different countries. 1,26–29 The discrepancy in the above finding might be attributable to the study setting difference where our study employed face-to-face interviews, whereas the other studies were web-based surveys. Besides, since our study participants were pregnant women, more negative responses could occur as pregnant women might have apprehension of vaccine effect on pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[2][3][4][5] Currently, although vaccinal programs are opened to pregnant women, there are still reports of a poor acceptance rate in this category of patients. 6,7 Indeed, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to potentially affect the placenta. 8 Several reports suggest an increased risk of placental lesions due to hypoperfusion and inflammation in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants select responses on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from “almost never,” “sometimes,” “often,” and “almost always.” The total score ranges between 20 and 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety levels. Some authors use cut-off points to define two-level state and trait anxiety (low and medium/high) (Özpelit et al, 2015 ; Mappa et al, 2020 , 2021 ). We used three-level cut-off points for reasons described in the literature (Tomašević-Todorovic et al, 2012 ; Candelori et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%