2018
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women on boards and efficiency in a business‐orientated environment

Abstract: This study proposes a new research approach to examining the relationship between board diversity in terms of gender differences and corporate performance, measured by technical efficiency. Moreover, this paper also examines the moderating role that institutional factors exert on this relationship through the cultural dimensions of the country of origin. The research questions are examined using an international sample of 2185 listed firms from 2006 to 2015, applying several truncated regression models for pan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, given the complexity of proactive environmental strategies as they require adaptations throughout the production process that involve large investments and high costs in the short term, and the economic benefits that will only materialize in the long term, the presence of women on the board that approves these strategies is indispensable for implementing eco‐innovation and eco‐design activities. In addition, it should be borne in mind that complex innovation activities require collaborative behaviour rather than competitive behaviour and environments that can encourage female directors, because their leadership style is more cooperative, inspiring, empathetic and geared towards change (De Marchi, 2012; Horbach, Oltra, & Belin, 2013; Uribe‐Bohorquez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Sánchez, 2019). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:H2 The higher the proportion of female directors, the higher the level of implementation of eco‐innovation and eco‐design strategies.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, given the complexity of proactive environmental strategies as they require adaptations throughout the production process that involve large investments and high costs in the short term, and the economic benefits that will only materialize in the long term, the presence of women on the board that approves these strategies is indispensable for implementing eco‐innovation and eco‐design activities. In addition, it should be borne in mind that complex innovation activities require collaborative behaviour rather than competitive behaviour and environments that can encourage female directors, because their leadership style is more cooperative, inspiring, empathetic and geared towards change (De Marchi, 2012; Horbach, Oltra, & Belin, 2013; Uribe‐Bohorquez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Sánchez, 2019). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:H2 The higher the proportion of female directors, the higher the level of implementation of eco‐innovation and eco‐design strategies.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Australian context, there has been a focus on governance, reporting, stakeholder engagement, and small-to-medium sized organisations (Beck, Frost, & Jones, 2018;Lane & Devin, 2018;Sheedy, 2016;Stewart & Gapp, 2014). Across all regions, including Australia, there is an increasing focus on the role of board diversity and corporate governance (Furlotti, Mazza, Tibiletti, & Triani, 2018;Galbreath, 2011;Manning, Braam, & Reimsbach, 2019;Setó-Pamies, 2015;Uribe-Bohorquez, Martínez-Ferrero, & García-Sánchez, 2018). As yet, there has not been field research into board directors CSR subculture in Australia, or other regions.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other models (e.g., GLOBE), the culture could be analyzed along with Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory (Hofstede, , ; Hofstede et al, ). Prior literature identified the Hofstede's cultural dimensions as the key determinant of CSR disclosure (Hur & Kim, ; Hussainey, Khlif, & Achek, ; Orij, ; Uribe‐Bohorquez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Sánchez, ). However, authors are aware that no study was conducted on the issue of cultural determinants of banks' CSR disclosure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%