Women in the Labor Market

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 130.179.This volume provides an excellent collection of 11 articles and accompanying comments on the role of women in the labor market. The book is divided into five parts: household decision-making and labor supply, labor supply projections, career decisions, wage differentials, and Equal Employment Opportunity influences on male-female wage and employment differences. The objective, as stated by the editors, was to provide theoretical and empirical ammunition for public policy decisions. However, the papers in this collection also accentuate the need to reevaluate the application of traditional theoretical models to the labor market for women. Many of the authors are proposing new methodological approaches to the issues addressed as much as they are investigating the specific hypotheses. Consequently, the evaluation of this book must focus on the resolution of the following two concerns: First, does the author satisfactorily test the hypotheses derived in the paper? Second, would the methodology utilized by the author eventually lead to a better analysis of these and other issues?Marilyn Manser and Murray Brown present a bargaining model of household decision-making. Their objective is to reduce the compartmentalization of household decisions concerning marriage, labor supply, and consumption. The model they developed as a substitute for the traditional neoclassical approach allows for varying distribution of power between the contracting parties. Hence, rather than arbitrarily imposing an aggregate utility function on the household, Manser and Brown investigate the implications of a game theoretic approach to the collective decision process. However, attempts to enrich a model often introduce new problems, and this is the case with the Manser-Brown model. The portrayal of the marriage decision, for example, could also describe the purchase decision for a potted plant. The marriage contract includes the consumption and labor supply decision for the duration of the marriage. The marriage contract is then thrown away only when one of the parties receives a better offer (or finds a "healthier" plant). Perhaps a more appropriate representation of the decision process would be a dynamic model with continuous learning and renegotiating. Moreover, the model could be adjusted to avoid the need for a more attractive marriage offer to sever the existing contract. Labor force participation for married women irrespective of the number of children in the household may become a serious option only long after the marriage decision has been made. The additional "costs" imposed on the negotiated items may then destroy the advantage of the union for one or both partie...