Women in Nontraditional Jobs

Blue, Carolyn L.

doi:10.1177/216507999304100504

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite the increase in female workers, there is a lack of understanding of the differences in workplace risks between sexes ( Tessier-Sherman et al, 2014 ). In jobs that require physical strength, female workers are more susceptible to workplace musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) as job demands represent a higher proportion of physical capacity ( Tessier-Sherman et al, 2014 ; Blue, 1993 ). As job demands are typically indiscriminate of the sex of the worker, females are left with a higher risk of WMSDs than male counterparts in typical blue-collar jobs ( Taiwo et al, 2008 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sex differences in wrist strength: a systematic review

Napper,

Sayal,

Holmes

et al. 2023

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sex differences in strength have been attributed to differences in body anthropometrics and composition; these factors are often ignored when generating workplace guidelines. These differences directly impact the upper extremity, leaving female workers exposed to injury risk. The wide range of tools and techniques for measuring upper extremity strength presents a challenge to ergonomists and work task designers; collating outcomes to provide a clear outlook of differences between males and females is essential and the purpose of this work. Four online databases were searched (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022339023) with a focus on articles assessing sex differences in wrist strength. A total of 2,378 articles were screened for relevancy; 25 full-text articles were included in this systematic review. Articles examined movement pairs (ulnar/radial deviation, pronation/supination, and flexion/extension), as well as contraction types (isometric and isokinetic) to observe sex differences in wrist strength. Across all articles, females produced ∼60–65% of male flexion/extension strength, ∼55–60% pronation/supination strength, and ∼60–70% ulnar/radial deviation strength. Overall, females presented lower strength-producing abilities than males, but when considering strength relative to body mass, male-female differences were less pronounced and occasionally females surpassed male strength metrics; typically, this occurred during flexion/extension, particularly in isokinetic contractions. This review has identified a scarcity of articles examining ulnar/radial deviation, pronation/supination, as well as isokinetic contractions; these are needed to supplement workplace exposure guidelines.

show abstract