Re-Imagining Christian Higher Education 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781351206235-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women in Leadership: The Future of Christian Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the publications to date relate to personal, cultural and professional challenges faced by female managers. Examples being the studies on cultural norms (such as gender stereotyping and cross-gender networking) affecting the female managers (Longman and Madsen, 2014;Tlaiss, 2013;Budworth and Mann, 2010). Hence, a majority of the female leadership studies conducted within the Middle East have highlighted social problems and shortcomings (Karam and Afiouni, 2013;Abdalla, 2015).…”
Section: Socially Dynamic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the publications to date relate to personal, cultural and professional challenges faced by female managers. Examples being the studies on cultural norms (such as gender stereotyping and cross-gender networking) affecting the female managers (Longman and Madsen, 2014;Tlaiss, 2013;Budworth and Mann, 2010). Hence, a majority of the female leadership studies conducted within the Middle East have highlighted social problems and shortcomings (Karam and Afiouni, 2013;Abdalla, 2015).…”
Section: Socially Dynamic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a critical evaluation based on repetitive themes, unique contribution to understanding this worldview, and usefulness for practitioners, this article primarily drew from the findings of six studies (Eliason, Hall, & Anderson, 2012; M. E. Hall, Christerson, & Cunningham, 2010; Joeckel & Chesnes, 2009; Lidzy, 2005; Longman & Anderson, 2016; Schutte, 2008), in addition to more fully explaining dimensions of the Women’s Leadership Development Model (Dahlvig & Longman, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of these realities is evident in the demographics of leadership within the CCCU. Approximately 60% of the students across the CCCU are women (Rine, 2012), a demographic slightly higher than the national average of 57% (Gangone & Lennon, 2014); however, as of 2015, women hold only 7% of the presidential roles (Longman & Anderson, 2016), compared with 26% of postsecondary presidents in the United States (Gangone & Lennon, 2014). Underrepresentation of women within CCCU leadership is evident in all key administrative posts: women hold 29% of the chief academic officer positions, 29% of the chief enrollment officer roles, 22% of the chief student development officer positions, and 14% of the chief development officer roles (Longman & Anderson, 2016).…”
Section: Women's Leadership Within the Context Of Evangelical Higher mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Professional mentor relationships are a key development component for all people, and especially women who are achieving ranks of higher leadership. The research on women college presidents' leadership development also points to the importance of mentoring and sponsorship (Longman & Madsen, 2014;Madsen, 2008;Moore Brown, 2005). found that two thirds of the women presidents they interviewed explained they had been mentored to the role of presidents.…”
Section: Reflections On Findings and The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%