2023
DOI: 10.6018/rcsar.480221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women in accounting: a historical review of obstacles and drivers on a patriarchal and classist path

Abstract: This document, through a systematic review of academic papers, presents a comprehensive and synthetic proposal that compiles, on the one hand, the prevailing macho, misogynistic and phallocentric obstacles and stereotypes at the family, social and work level between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries and that had an impact on the accounting profession, hindering the access and evolution of women in it. In contrast, a series of factors are presented that drove the training and entry of women to bookkeeping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature dealing with gender diversity in organisations has highlighted a number of business benefits associated with the presence of women (Uribe-Bohorquez et al ., 2019; Amorelli and García-Sánchez, 2020, 2021, 2023; García-Sánchez et al ., 2023), at a general level and specifically in leadership positions. Amongst these, it is worth mentioning (1) a more qualified human talent, on the one hand, due to a greater number of candidates and greater internal competition (Smith, 2005) and, on the other hand, due to the female need to socially reaffirm its adequacy (Talmud and Izraeli, 1999; Uribe-Bohorquez and García-Sánchez, 2023b), which leads to a greater education of women (Singh et al ., 2008; Storvik and Teigen, 2010); (2) better decision-making, thanks to a wider range of perspectives, skills and abilities (Campbell and Mínguez Vera, 2008; Post and Byron, 2015; Terjesen et al ., 2009) that allow for greater creativity, learning and innovation (Erhardt et al ., 2003; Kawai et al ., 2023; Krishnan and Park, 2005) as well as a more independent and ethical criterion (Kirsch, 2018); (3) increased activity and reduced conflict (Huse and Solberg, 2006; Nielsen and Huse, 2010a, b); (4) a better reputation with different stakeholders (Rose, 2007); (5) a reduction in costs (due to lower turnover and absenteeism) and, ultimately, thanks to all of the above, an improvement in sustainable competitive advantage, leading to business growth, improved financial performance (Robinson and Dechant, 1997; Thomas and Ely, 1996) and better organisational performance (Cumming and Leung, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%

The COVID-19, a crossroads for female directors

Garcia-Sanchez,
Uribe Bohorquez,
Aibar-Guzmán
et al. 2023
MD
Self Cite
“…The literature dealing with gender diversity in organisations has highlighted a number of business benefits associated with the presence of women (Uribe-Bohorquez et al ., 2019; Amorelli and García-Sánchez, 2020, 2021, 2023; García-Sánchez et al ., 2023), at a general level and specifically in leadership positions. Amongst these, it is worth mentioning (1) a more qualified human talent, on the one hand, due to a greater number of candidates and greater internal competition (Smith, 2005) and, on the other hand, due to the female need to socially reaffirm its adequacy (Talmud and Izraeli, 1999; Uribe-Bohorquez and García-Sánchez, 2023b), which leads to a greater education of women (Singh et al ., 2008; Storvik and Teigen, 2010); (2) better decision-making, thanks to a wider range of perspectives, skills and abilities (Campbell and Mínguez Vera, 2008; Post and Byron, 2015; Terjesen et al ., 2009) that allow for greater creativity, learning and innovation (Erhardt et al ., 2003; Kawai et al ., 2023; Krishnan and Park, 2005) as well as a more independent and ethical criterion (Kirsch, 2018); (3) increased activity and reduced conflict (Huse and Solberg, 2006; Nielsen and Huse, 2010a, b); (4) a better reputation with different stakeholders (Rose, 2007); (5) a reduction in costs (due to lower turnover and absenteeism) and, ultimately, thanks to all of the above, an improvement in sustainable competitive advantage, leading to business growth, improved financial performance (Robinson and Dechant, 1997; Thomas and Ely, 1996) and better organisational performance (Cumming and Leung, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%

The COVID-19, a crossroads for female directors

Garcia-Sanchez,
Uribe Bohorquez,
Aibar-Guzmán
et al. 2023
MD
Self Cite