1994
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v1.i1.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women Graduate Students in Mathematics and Physics: Reflections on Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in studies conducted in these countries, undergraduate women in STEM majors often report feelings of isolation, intimidation, and even hostility from male peers as well as male professors, and they often have lower self-confidence in STEM domains than men, despite equal or even higher levels of achievement (e.g., Erwin and Maurutto 1998;Ferreira 2003;Hollenshead et al 1994;Meinholdt and Murray 1999;Warrington and Younger 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in studies conducted in these countries, undergraduate women in STEM majors often report feelings of isolation, intimidation, and even hostility from male peers as well as male professors, and they often have lower self-confidence in STEM domains than men, despite equal or even higher levels of achievement (e.g., Erwin and Maurutto 1998;Ferreira 2003;Hollenshead et al 1994;Meinholdt and Murray 1999;Warrington and Younger 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the realm of power and influence, we have moved gradually from a focus on the ways women's behavior should change in order for them to exert influence successfully (e.g., assertiveness training) to explorations of the ways women's personal inclinations toward leadership can be trumped by gendered context (Megargee 1969;Nyquist and Spence 1986;Lips and Keener 2007), and ways women's attempts at leadership in some contexts can be ignored (Porter and Geis 1981), undermined (Butler and Geis 1990), or leave women open to disparagement and/or hostility (Carli 1999;Rudman 1998). In the realm of cognitive abilities and achievement, the field has moved from a fairly narrow focus on whether and why girls and women might have weaker mathematical ability than boys and men (e.g., Benbow and Stanley 1980) to sophisticated explorations of the several interlocking abilities necessary to mathematical thinking (Spelke 2005) and of the subtle contextual variables, such as stereotype threat (Spencer et al 1999), negative expectations (Fredericks and Eccles 2002;Ma 2001), anticipation of career-family conflict (Singer et al 2005), lack of role models (Marx and Roman 2002) and of mentoring and social support (Hollenshead et al 1994), and erosion of the sense of opportunity and possibility (Lips 2004) that act as barriers to girls and women in the pursuit of mathematics and the sciences.…”
Section: A Changing Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual factors found to inhibit the participation and integration of women and students of color into mathematics included (a) a need for interaction, att ention, and reinforcement (e.g., Etzkowitz, Kemelgor, & Uzzi, 2000;Fennema & Peterson, 1985); (b) a need for a structure centered on student development instead of "fi ltering out" (e.g., Ames, 1992); (c) a lack of confi dence (e.g., Etzkowitz et al, 2000;Sonnert & Holton, 1995); and (d) a sense of confl ict with family responsibilities. Relational factors found to inhibit the participation and integration of women and students of color into mathematics included (a) a transmission model of pedagogy (e.g., Rogoff , 1994); (b) incompatible relationships with advisors (e.g., Girves & Wemmerus, 1988;Hollenshead et al, 1994;Sonnert & Holton, 1995); (c) patt erns of isolation (e.g., Etzkowitz et al, 2000;Herzig, 2002;Hollenshead et al, 1994); and (d) a sense of competition.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor contributing to this underrepresentation of women is the graduate-school experience (Ferreira, 2003;Hirt & Muff o, 1998). The "chilly climate" uncovered by Hall and Sandler (1982) in a study of att rition of undergraduate women in science also is experienced by women in graduate school (Dresselhaus, Franz, & Clark, 1995;Ferreira, 2003;Hollenshead, Soellner-Younce, & Wenzel, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%