Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-04830-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women, Gender, Religion: Troubling Categories and Transforming Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an area of scholarship concerned with examining the gendered exercise of power across public and private domains, much remains to be interrogated within all major religions wherein: "men hold "most or all of the roles of authority and prestige' and "from these positions … control and dictate the norms of the [religion] for all women" (Gross 1996: 106). On another level, the silence on religion confirms the observations (Castelli 2001;Beattie 2005; and others) that most such scholarship retains an unexamined Enlightenment view of religion-as the antithesis of rationality and freedom. The persistence of this view of religion in feminist political theory, however, is at odds with quite basic feminist critiques of the public-private divide, which now underpin the most moderate liberal feminist agendas (evidenced, e.g., by the focus on remedying domestic violence or securing "family-friendly" conditions of work).…”
Section: Feminism Religion and Democracy On The Critical Edges Of Esupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As an area of scholarship concerned with examining the gendered exercise of power across public and private domains, much remains to be interrogated within all major religions wherein: "men hold "most or all of the roles of authority and prestige' and "from these positions … control and dictate the norms of the [religion] for all women" (Gross 1996: 106). On another level, the silence on religion confirms the observations (Castelli 2001;Beattie 2005; and others) that most such scholarship retains an unexamined Enlightenment view of religion-as the antithesis of rationality and freedom. The persistence of this view of religion in feminist political theory, however, is at odds with quite basic feminist critiques of the public-private divide, which now underpin the most moderate liberal feminist agendas (evidenced, e.g., by the focus on remedying domestic violence or securing "family-friendly" conditions of work).…”
Section: Feminism Religion and Democracy On The Critical Edges Of Esupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This negative rendering of ‘religion’ is in many respects an ironic holdover from Feminism's own Enlightenment inheritance. (Castelli, 2001: 5)…”
Section: Feminist Critiques Of the Ecrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicts between the claims of women's equality and the claims of religion are well-documented vis-à-vis all major religions and across all regions (Sharma, 1987; Plaskow and Christ, 1989; Castelli, 2001; King and Beattie, 2005). Most recently, in Europe, enlargement and immigration have led to increased awareness of religious diversity and a moral panic about the presence of Islam in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Castelli (2001), the issue of power is an imminent principle in the intersection of gender and religion and profoundly landscape for scholar who examines religious discourses and practices. Resnick Dufour (2000) suggests to classify Jewish feminists’ identities into three particular categories (inclusionist, transformationist, and reinterpretationist).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%