“…Findings revealed a complexity of perceptions—positive, negative, and mixed—toward the signs of solidarity that likely impact participants' impressions of the STEM learning environment and their sense of belonging (Davies et al, 2005; Ong et al, 2018; Solórzano et al, 2000). Consistent with Purdie‐Vaughns et al (2008), their reactions to the signs in part reflect their diversity as individuals—including in their experiences of cross‐race interactions, personal degree of criticism about the signs as being self‐serving (Lawson, 2020; Wilson, 2020), and skepticism that the signs indicated earnest faculty interest in creating inclusive counter‐spaces (Ong et al, 2018; Solórzano et al, 2000; Terrell et al, 2009) for students from minoritized backgrounds. In this regard, if the hope is to foster safety and a sense of belonging, the well‐intentioned signs of solidarity may need to be complemented with additional messaging to convey a comprehensive understanding of inclusion, as well as consistent actions by aspiring allies (Lawson, 2020; Stone‐Sabali et al, 2023).…”