2000
DOI: 10.1080/01402390008437811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women and the military

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also the argument, extending this logic, that the very nature of modern warfare, involving asymmetric or virtual engagement and a supposed ‘revolution in military affairs’ 8 as well as the extension of MOOTW, involves a rethink of women's military roles, not on the basis of their (supposed) aptitudes for emotional work, but on the basis of re‐thinking more traditional or conservative notions about women's (non‐ or limited) military participation (Kennedy‐Pipe, 2000). This rethinking of women's traditional roles involves a quite fundamental reconceptualization of the character of military organizations based on a shift from essentialist (biologically determinist) constructions of female difference and moving instead towards a position where gender is understood as culturally constituted.…”
Section: Concluding Observations On Female and Military Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the argument, extending this logic, that the very nature of modern warfare, involving asymmetric or virtual engagement and a supposed ‘revolution in military affairs’ 8 as well as the extension of MOOTW, involves a rethink of women's military roles, not on the basis of their (supposed) aptitudes for emotional work, but on the basis of re‐thinking more traditional or conservative notions about women's (non‐ or limited) military participation (Kennedy‐Pipe, 2000). This rethinking of women's traditional roles involves a quite fundamental reconceptualization of the character of military organizations based on a shift from essentialist (biologically determinist) constructions of female difference and moving instead towards a position where gender is understood as culturally constituted.…”
Section: Concluding Observations On Female and Military Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservative opponents tend to argue that masculine privilege is necessary to motivate men to fight and that the presence of women threatens this (inter alia Gat, 2000;Van Creveld, 2000a, 2000bFrost, 2001;Holmes, 2003). Liberal and civic republican feminists have challenged this on the grounds that military service is a (pre)condition to full-citizenship and that women have a right, and even a duty, to enlist (inter alia Stiehm, 1982;Feinman, 1998;Kennedy-Pipe, 2000). Others have problematized women's service on the grounds that it militarizes them (Tiffany, 1981;Klein, 2002), normalizes masculine military culture (Sasson-Levy, 2003) or violates the peaceful nature of women (Ruddick, 1989).…”
Section: Distractions and Disruptions: Women In Armed Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the essential attributes of future warriors will almost certainly derive less from physical strength and more from technical abilities. 34 Furthermore, such skeptical thinking neglects the affirmative arguments for capitalizing on gender diversity in the future robotic battlespace.…”
Section: Impact Of Robotics Revolution On Women In Combat Debatementioning
confidence: 99%