Feminist science scholars need models of science that allow feminist accounts, not only of the inception and reception of scientific theories, but of their content as well.I argue that a "Network Model," properly modified, makes clear theoretically how race, sex and class considerations can influence the content of scientific theories. The adoption of the iicorpuscular philosophy" by Robert Boyle and other Puritan scientists during the English Civil War offers us a good case on which to test such a model. According to these men, the minute corpuscles constituting the physical world are dead, not aliwe; passiwe, not actiwe. I argue that they chose the principle that matter is passive in part because its contrary, the principle that matter is aliwe and self-mowing, had a radical social meaning and use to the women and men working for progressive change in mid-sewenteenth century England.Whenever she tells a story, the storyteller has a story model, one that outlines how a good story should go. When Marie Boas told the story of Robert Boyle's contributions to physics and chemistry in the midseventeenth Century, she put her account of Boyle's life in a chapter separate from chapters describing his scientific achievements (Boas 1958). In her biography we discover that Boyle (1626-1691) was the youngest son of the fabulously wealthy, unscrupulous Earl of Cork. Old Cork was killed defending his holdings in Hypatia vol. 3 , no. 1 (Spring 1988). 0 by Elizabeth Potter.